Validation of and Demographically Adjusted Normative Data for the Learning Ratio Derived from the RAVLT in Robustly Intact Older Adults. (16th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hammers, Dustin B; Spencer, Robert J; Apostolova, Liana G
• Is Part Of: Archives of clinical neuropsychology. Volume 37:Number 5(2022)
• Page Start: 981
• Page End: 993
• Publication Date: 2022-02-16
• Subjects: Learning -- Memory -- Alzheimer's disease -- Mild cognitive impairment; Clinical neuropsychology -- Periodicals; 616.805
• DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acac002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0887-6177

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The learning ratio (LR) is a novel learning slope score that was developed to identify learning more accurately by considering the proportion of information learned after the first trial of a multi-trial learning task. Specifically, LR is the number of items learned after trial one divided by the number of items yet to be learned. Although research on LR has been promising, convergent validation, clinical characterization, and demographic norming of this LR metric are warranted to understand its clinical utility when derived from the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (RAVLT). Method: Data from 674 robustly cognitively intact older participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (aged 54– 89) were used to calculate the LR metric. Comparison of LR's relationship with standard memory measures was undertaken relative to other traditional learning slope metrics. In addition, retest reliability at 6, 12, and 24 months was examined, and demographically adjusted normative comparisons were developed. Results: Lower LR scores were associated with poorer performances on memory measures, and LR scores outperformed traditional learning slope calculations across all analyses. Retest reliability exceeded acceptability thresholds across time, and demographically adjusted normative equations suggested better performance for cognitively intact participants than those with mild cognitive impairment. Conclusions: These results suggest that this LR score possesses sound retest reliability and can better reflect learning capacity than traditional learning slope calculations. With the added development and validation of regression-based normative comparisons, these findings support the use of the RAVLT LR as a clinical tool to inform clinical decision-making and treatment.