Evaluation Methods in Community Microgrant Programs for Health Promotion: A Scoping Review. Issue 5 (September 2022) - Conlin, Michèle P.
Abstract : Context: Evaluating community-based health promotion programs is an essential aspect of public health programming to ensure evidence-based practices, justify limited resource allocation, and share knowledge about promising strategies. Community microgrant schemes represent a viable strategy to strengthen local health promotion, yet limited guidance exists surrounding the evaluation of such programs. Objective: This research aimed to map methods used in evaluating community microgrants programs for health promotion. Design: A scoping review in accordance with Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. Eligibility Criteria: Peer-reviewed academic and gray literature, which evaluated processes and/or outcomes of nonprescriptive community-based microgrant program for health promotion in high-income countries. Study Selection: Literature was identified through MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and EMBASE databases, Google and DuckDuckGo browsers, and hand-searching key reference lists. Articles were screened by title, abstract, and then full-text. Main Outcome Measure(s): Review findings were mapped according to included sources' evaluation methodologies. Results: Eighteen academic publications describing 14 microgrant programs met the inclusion criteria. These spanned the years 1996 to 2020 and were located across 5 countries. Evaluation methods were very similar in terms of design (mixed-methods case studies) and focus (both processes and outcomes) and yet varied widely with regard to measurements and data collection. Few made explicit the use of an evaluation framework, chose to involve stakeholders in the evaluation process, or discussed application and dissemination of evaluation findings. Discussion: Community-based microgrant programs for health promotion are a promising model in diverse settings and with various health priorities and targets, yet robust evaluations of their implementation and effectiveness are lacking. The review highlights the need to further develop and support evaluation practices in public health, even in small-scale programs with limited budgets.