Predictive performances of 6 data mining techniques for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome. Issue 26 (30th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Luo, Miao; Feng, Yuan; Luo, Jingying; Li, XiaoLin; Han, JianFang; Li, Taoping
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 101:Issue 26(2022)
• Page Start: e29724
• Publication Date: 2022-06-30
• Subjects: artificial neural network -- Bayesian network -- data mining -- decision tree -- prediction model -- support vector; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029724
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: This study compared the effects of 6 types of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) prediction models to develop a reference for selecting OSAHS data mining tools in clinical practice. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 401 cases. They were randomly divided into 2 groups: training (70%) and testing (30%). Logistic regression, a Bayesian network, an artificial neural network, a support vector learning machine, C5.0, and a classification and regression tree were each adopted to establish 6 prediction models. After training, the 6 models were used to test the remaining samples and calculate the correct and error rates of each model. Results: Twenty-one input variables for which the difference between the patient and nonpatient groups was statistically significant were considered. The models found the abdominal circumference, neck circumference, and nocturia ≥2 per night to be the most important variables. The support vector machine, neural network, and C5.0 models performed better than the classification and regression tree, Bayesian network, and logistic regression models. Conclusions: In terms of predicting the risk of OSAHS, the support vector machine, neural network, and C5.0 were superior to the classification and regression tree, Bayesian network, and logistic regression models. However, such results were obtained based on the data of a single center, so they need to be further validated by other institutions.