Factors Predicting Progression to Severe COVID-19: A Competing Risk Survival Analysis of 1753 Patients in Community Isolation in Wuhan, China. (June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Simiao; Sun, Hui; Heng, Mei; Tong, Xunliang; Geldsetzer, Pascal; Wang, Zhuoran; Wu, Peixin; Yang, Juntao; Hu, Yu; Wang, Chen; Bärnighausen, Till
• Is Part Of: Engineering. Volume 13(2022)
• Page Start: 99
• Page End: 106
• Publication Date: 2022-06
• Subjects: COVID-19 -- Asymptomatic and mild -- Community isolation -- Fangcang shelter hospital -- Competing risk survival analysis; Engineering -- Periodicals; Engineering -- China -- Periodicals; 620.005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eng.2021.07.021
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2095-8099

Abstract

Abstract: Most studies of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) progression have focused on the transfer of patients within secondary or tertiary care hospitals from regular wards to intensive care units. Little is known about the risk factors predicting the progression to severe COVID-19 among patients in community isolation, who are either asymptomatic or suffer from only mild to moderate symptoms. Using a multivariable competing risk survival analysis, we identify several important predictors of progression to severe COVID-19—rather than to recovery—among patients in the largest community isolation center in Wuhan, China from 6 February 2020 (when the center opened) to 9 March 2020 (when it closed). All patients in community isolation in Wuhan were either asymptomatic or suffered from mild to moderate COVID-19 symptoms. We performed competing risk survival analysis on time-to-event data from a cohort study of all COVID-19 patients ( n = 1753) in the isolation center. The potential predictors we investigated were the routine patient data collected upon admission to the isolation center: age, sex, respiratory symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, general symptoms, and computed tomography (CT) scan signs. The main outcomes were time to severe COVID-19 or recovery. The factors predicting progression to severe COVID-19 were: male sex (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04–1.58, p = 0.018), young and old age, dyspnea (HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.24–2.01, p < 0.001), and CT signs of ground-glass opacity (HR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.04–1.86, p = 0.024) and infiltrating shadows (HR = 1.84, 95% CI 1.22–2.78, p = 0.004). The risk of progression was found to be lower among patients with nausea or vomiting (HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.30–0.96, p = 0.036) and headaches (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.29–0.99, p = 0.046). Our results suggest that several factors that can be easily measured even in resource-poor settings (dyspnea, sex, and age) can be used to identify mild COVID-19 patients who are at increased risk of disease progression. Looking for CT signs of ground-glass opacity and infiltrating shadows may be an affordable option to support triage decisions in resource-rich settings. Common and unspecific symptoms (headaches, nausea, and vomiting) are likely to have led to the identification and subsequent community isolation of COVID-19 patients who were relatively unlikely to deteriorate. Future public health and clinical guidelines should build on this evidence to improve the screening, triage, and monitoring of COVID-19 patients who are asymtomatic or suffer from mild to moderate symptoms.