Protocol for the development and multisite validation of the Quality of Dying and Death-Revised Global Version scale. Issue 7 (25th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: An, Ekaterina; Tilly, Alyssa; Mah, Kenneth; Lewin, Warren; Chandrakumar, Mano; Baguio, Arnell; Jaffer, Nazira; Chikasema, Maria; Thambo, Lameck; Ntizimira, Christian; Namisango, Eve; Hales, Sarah; Zimmermann, Camilla; Wolofsky, Kayla; Goombs, Mary; Rodin, Gary
• Is Part Of: BMJ open. Volume 12:Issue 7(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-07-25
• Subjects: Quality in health care -- Adult oncology -- Adult palliative care; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.72
• DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064508
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2044-6055

Abstract

Abstract : Introduction: Evaluating the quality of dying and death is essential to ensure high-quality end-of-life care. The Quality of Dying and Death (QODD) scale is the best-validated measure of the construct, but many items are not relevant to participants, particularly in low-resource settings. The aim of this multisite cross-sectional study is to develop and validate the QODD-Revised Global Version (QODD-RGV), to enhance ease of completion and relevance in higher-resource and lower-resource settings. Methods and analysis: This study will be a two-arm, multisite evaluation of the cultural relevance, reliability and validity of the QODD-RGV across four participating North American hospices and a palliative care site in Malawi, Africa. Bereaved caregivers and healthcare providers of patients who died at a participating North American hospice and bereaved caregivers of patients who died of cancer at the Malawian palliative care site will complete the QODD-RGV and validation measures. Cognitive interviews with subsets of North American and Malawian caregivers will assess the perceived relevance of the scale items. Psychometric evaluations will include internal consistency and convergent and concurrent validity. Ethics and dissemination: The North American arm received approval from the University Health Network Research Ethics Board (21-5143) and the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board (21-1172). Ethics approval for the Malawi arm is being obtained from the University of North Carolina Institutional Review Board and the Malawian National Health Science Research Committee. Study findings will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.