Investigating improvements in premature death in two rural, majority-minority counties in the south. (August 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Investigating improvements in premature death in two rural, majority-minority counties in the south. (August 2020)
- Main Title:
- Investigating improvements in premature death in two rural, majority-minority counties in the south
- Authors:
- Lyn, Rodney
Heath, Erica
Torres, Andrea
Andrews, Christine - Abstract:
- Abstract: This exploratory study investigates counties in the southeast United States with mortality outcomes that were better than might be expected given their sociodemographic profiles (i.e., positive deviance). This study seeks to understand the community characteristics with the potential to moderate the negative health outcomes typically associated with social, geographic, or economic disadvantages. This article describes the process used to identify positive deviants and reports on the findings from key informant interviews in positive deviant counties to identify community factors or practices that might contribute to positive deviance in the observed outcomes. County Health Rankings and Roadmaps 2015 data and mortality trends were examined to identify positive deviant counties. The inclusion criteria were median household incomes in the lowest tertile of their state, ≥ 33% African American, and premature mortality rankings (as measured by Years of Potential Life Lost–YPLL) in the top quartile within their state. After benchmarking county rates against national figures and retaining counties with significant improvement trends, two counties emerged as positive deviants, Dooly County, Georgia and Washington County, North Carolina. Key informant interviews (n = 11) were conducted with community stakeholders in the study counties to better understand the community characteristics that could lead to the observed outcomes. Interview data were analyzed using qualitativeAbstract: This exploratory study investigates counties in the southeast United States with mortality outcomes that were better than might be expected given their sociodemographic profiles (i.e., positive deviance). This study seeks to understand the community characteristics with the potential to moderate the negative health outcomes typically associated with social, geographic, or economic disadvantages. This article describes the process used to identify positive deviants and reports on the findings from key informant interviews in positive deviant counties to identify community factors or practices that might contribute to positive deviance in the observed outcomes. County Health Rankings and Roadmaps 2015 data and mortality trends were examined to identify positive deviant counties. The inclusion criteria were median household incomes in the lowest tertile of their state, ≥ 33% African American, and premature mortality rankings (as measured by Years of Potential Life Lost–YPLL) in the top quartile within their state. After benchmarking county rates against national figures and retaining counties with significant improvement trends, two counties emerged as positive deviants, Dooly County, Georgia and Washington County, North Carolina. Key informant interviews (n = 11) were conducted with community stakeholders in the study counties to better understand the community characteristics that could lead to the observed outcomes. Interview data were analyzed using qualitative methods. Key informant interviews revealed three emergent themes: 1. accessibility and availability of healthcare, 2. the provision of a robust EMS system, and 3. coordination of county-funded services targeting vulnerable populations. The positive deviance framework provides a foundation for the identification of community factors or practices with the potential to create a 'culture of health' in communities at the greatest risk for adverse health outcomes. Our findings suggest that healthcare supported by the coordination of non-emergency transportation and health and social services across numerous stakeholders may have contributed to observed outcomes in the study counties. Highlights: This study investigated premature mortality trends in counties in the southeast United States. Two counties out of the 131 counties examined met the criteria for inclusion. Community stakeholders (n=11) were identified and interviewed as part of a site visit to the study counties. For premature death in the County Health Rankings, Dooly County ranked 20th in Georgia in 2015. For premature death in the County Health Rankings, Washington County ranked 23rd in North Carolina in 2015. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- SSM - population health. Volume 11(2020)
- Journal:
- SSM - population health
- Issue:
- Volume 11(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 11, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 11
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0011-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-08
- Subjects:
- Positive deviance -- Premature mortality -- Determinants of health -- County health rankings -- Qualitative research -- Community health
Social medicine -- Periodicals
Medical anthropology -- Periodicals
Public health -- Periodicals
Psychology -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
362.105 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/23528273 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100618 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2352-8273
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22536.xml