Towards the development of osteochondral allografts with reduced immunogenicity. (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Neunaber, Claudia; Dalinghaus, Catharina; Bundkirchen, Katrin; Toumpaniari, Sotiria; Gladitz, Luisa Marilena; Joda, Akram; Morticelli, Lucrezia; Krettek, Christian; Korossis, Sotirios
• Is Part Of: Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. Volume 133(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Articular cartilage -- Scaffold -- Decellularization -- Histology -- Biomechanics; Biomedical materials -- Periodicals; Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties -- Periodicals; Biomedical materials; Biomedical materials -- Mechanical properties; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.28
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105359
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-6161

Abstract

Abstract: Nowadays, repair and replacement of hyaline articular cartilage still challenges orthopedic surgery. Using a graft of decellularized articular cartilage as a structural scaffold is considered as a promising therapy. So far, successful cell removal has only been possible for small samples with destruction of the macrostructure or loss of biomechanics. Our aim was to develop a mild, enzyme-free chemical decellularization procedure while preserving the biomechanical properties of cartilage. Porcine osteochondral cylinders (diameter: 12 mm; height: 10 mm) were divided into four groups: Native plugs (NA), decellularized plugs treated with PBS, Triton-X-100 and SDS (DC), and plugs additionally treated with freeze-thaw-cycles of −20 °C, −80 °C or shock freezing in nitrogen (N2 ) before decellularization. In a non-decalcified HE stain the decellularization efficiency (cell removal, cell size, depth of decellularization) was calculated. For biomechanics the elastic and compression modulus, transition and failure strain as well as transition and failure stress were evaluated. The −20 °C, −80 °C, and N2 groups showed a complete decellularization of the superficial and middle zone. In the deep zone cells could not be removed in any experimental group. The biomechanical analysis showed only a reduced elastic modulus in all decellularized samples. No significant differences were found for the other biomechanical parameters. Graphical abstract: Image 1