Utility of acoustic indices for ecological monitoring in complex sonic environments. (February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ross, Samuel R.P-J.; Friedman, Nicholas R.; Yoshimura, Masashi; Yoshida, Takuma; Donohue, Ian; Economo, Evan P.
• Is Part Of: Ecological indicators. Volume 121(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-02
• Subjects: Soundscape -- Ecoacoustics -- Okinawa -- Passive acoustic monitoring -- Aural inventory -- Cicadas; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals; Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; 333.71405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107114
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-160X

Abstract

Highlights: Acoustic monitoring studies use acoustic indices as indicators of biodiversity. We tested index performance under different background sonic conditions. Most acoustic indices were sensitive to urban, wind/rain and insect noise. Stridulating insect noise particularly reduced acoustic index performance. We provide practical recommendations for index use based on study design. Abstract: With the continued adoption of passive acoustic monitoring as a tool for rapid and high-resolution ecosystem monitoring, ecologists are increasingly making use of a suite of acoustic indices to summarise the sonic environment. Though these indices are often reported to well represent some aspect of the biology of an ecosystem, the degree to which they are confounded by various extraneous sonic conditions is largely unknown. We conducted an aural inventory across 23 field sites in Okinawa to identify the number of unique animal sounds present in recordings. Using these values of 'measured richness', we then examined how the performance of 11 commonly-used acoustic indices varied across a range of sonic conditions (including in the presence and absence of insect stridulations, audible wind or rain, and human-related sounds). Our analysis identified both well- and poor-performing acoustic indices, as well as those that were particularly sensitive to sonic conditions. Only two indices reflected measured richness across the full range of sonic conditions examined. A few indices were relatively insensitive to extraneous sonic conditions, but no index correlated with measured richness when masked by sound from broadband stridulating insects. Our results demonstrate considerable sensitivity of most commonly used acoustic indices to confounding sonic conditions, highlighting the challenges of working with large acoustic datasets collected in the field. We make practical recommendations for acoustic index use based on study design, with the aim of identifying the suite of acoustic indices with greatest utility as indicators for rapid biodiversity monitoring and management of the world's natural soundscapes.