A planning tool for optimal three-dimensional formation flight maneuvers of satellites in VLEO using aerodynamic lift and drag via yaw angle deviations. (September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Traub, Constantin; Fasoulas, Stefanos; Herdrich, Georg H.
• Is Part Of: Acta astronautica. Volume 198(2022)
• Page Start: 135
• Page End: 151
• Publication Date: 2022-09
• Subjects: Very low earth orbits (VLEO) -- Satellite aerodynamics -- Differential lift -- Differential drag -- Satellite formation flight; Astronautics -- Periodicals; Outer space -- Exploration -- Periodicals; Astronautics; Periodicals; 629.405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.04.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-5765

Abstract

Abstract: Differential drag is a promising option to control the relative motion of distributed satellites in the Very Low Earth Orbit regime which are not equipped with dedicated thrusting devices. A major downside of the methodology, however, is that its control authority is (mainly) limited to the in-plane relative motion control. By additionally applying differential lift, however, all three translational degrees-of-freedom become controllable. In this article, we present a tool to flexibly plan optimal three-dimensional formation flight maneuvers via differential lift and drag. In the planning process, the most significant perturbing effects in this orbital regime, namely the J 2 effect and atmospheric forces, are taken into account. Moreover, varying atmospheric densities as well as the co-rotation of the atmosphere are considered. Besides its flexible and high-fidelity nature, the major assets of the proposed methodology are that the in-and out-of-plane relative motion are controlled simultaneously via deviations in the yaw angles of the respective satellites and that the planned trajectory is optimal in a sense that the overall decay during the maneuver is minimized. Thereby, the remaining lifetime of the satellites is maximized and the practicability and sustainability of the methodology significantly increased. To the best of the authors knowledge, a tool with the given capabilities has not yet been presented in literature. The resulting trajectories for three fundamentally different relevant formation flight maneuvers are presented and discussed in detail in order to indicate the vast range of applicability of the tool. Highlights: High-fidelity planning of 3D formation flight maneuvers via diff. aerodynamic forces. Simultaneous in- and out-of-plane relative motion control. Chattering or bang-bang type control switches are avoided. The decay during the maneuver is minimized (lifetime of the satellites maximized). Nearly non-singular orbital elements are employed.