Differentiating between different forms of moral obligations. (30th April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Anderson, Rajen A.; Ruisch, Benjamin C.; Pizarro, David A.
• Is Part Of: Behavioral and brain sciences. Volume 43(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-04-30
• Subjects: Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Psychology -- Periodicals; Human behavior -- Periodicals; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Brain -- Periodicals; 616.89142
• DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X19002589
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0140-525X

Abstract

Abstract: We argue that Tomasello's account overlooks important psychological distinctions between how humans judge different types of moral obligations, such as prescriptive obligations (i.e., what one should do) and proscriptive obligations (i.e., what one should not do). Specifically, evaluating these different types of obligations rests on different psychological inputs and has distinct downstream consequences for judgments of moral character.