Characteristics and recidivism in relation to arrest: differentiating between partner violent perpetrator subtypes. Issue 2 (2nd July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Petersson, Joakim; Strand, Susanne
• Is Part Of: Nordic journal of criminology. Volume 21:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 203
• Page End: 222
• Publication Date: 2020-07-02
• Subjects: Arrest -- intimate partner violence -- subtypes -- recidivism -- deterrent; Criminology -- Periodicals; Crime prevention -- Periodicals; Crime -- Periodicals; Criminology; Crime prevention; Crime; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 364.05
• DOI: 10.1080/2578983X.2020.1727119
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2578-983X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study aimed to describe and compare arrested and non-arrested male intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetrators, in terms of individual characteristics and variables related to the IPV incident, in a sample of 628 perpetrators reported to the Swedish police. We also explored recidivism rates in relation to arrest within the total sample, as well as among subtypes of partner violent men (i.e. generally violent [GV] and partner only [PO] violent). The perpetrators in this longitudinal study were reported to the police for male-to-female perpetrated IPV and subjected to a structured violence risk assessment between 2011 and 2014. The results showed that arrested perpetrators were more likely to be reported for severe forms of IPV, being assessed by the police post-arrest with a higher risk for recidivism, and being more likely to be prosecuted for the reported IPV incident. There was also a significant interaction effect between subtypes and arrest for IPV recidivism within 12 months post-arrest. Among those perpetrators who were arrested, GV perpetrators were more than four times as likely as PO violent perpetrators to recidivate in IPV. The results of this study highlight the importance of differentiating between subtypes when examining the impact of sanctions on IPV recidivism.