Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects. (29th October 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects. (29th October 2017)
- Main Title:
- Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: collaborative learning across multiple projects
- Authors:
- Weber, Christine
Åberg, Ulrika
Buijse, Anthonie D.
Hughes, Francine M.R.
McKie, Brendan G.
Piégay, Hervé
Roni, Phil
Vollenweider, Stefan
Haertel‐Borer, Susanne - Abstract:
- Abstract : River restoration is a relatively recent undertaking, with high levels of complexity and uncertainty involved. Many restoration projects have been monitored over the past three decades, however, results have rarely been compared across projects thereby limiting our ability to identify factors that influence restoration outcomes. Programmatic monitoring and evaluation (ProME) that builds on standardized surveys and systematic cross‐project comparison allows for collaborative learning, transfer of results across restoration projects and for adaptive management and monitoring. We present a conceptual framework for ProME consisting of four goals and nine principles. First, ProME accounts for complexity, uncertainty, and change in order to contribute to sustainable river management over the long term. Second, ProME promotes collaborative learning and adaptation by standardizing the sampling design for the field surveys at multiple projects and by disseminating findings across stakeholders. Third, ProME verifies to what extent restoration has been achieved, i.e., it must quantify the size and direction of change. Fourth, ProME identifies why the observed effects were present, thereby improving our mechanistic understanding of river functioning. We conclude with potential extensions of the framework (e.g., evaluating cumulative effects of projects within a catchment). Our conceptual framework presents a structured approach toward a more systematic learning andAbstract : River restoration is a relatively recent undertaking, with high levels of complexity and uncertainty involved. Many restoration projects have been monitored over the past three decades, however, results have rarely been compared across projects thereby limiting our ability to identify factors that influence restoration outcomes. Programmatic monitoring and evaluation (ProME) that builds on standardized surveys and systematic cross‐project comparison allows for collaborative learning, transfer of results across restoration projects and for adaptive management and monitoring. We present a conceptual framework for ProME consisting of four goals and nine principles. First, ProME accounts for complexity, uncertainty, and change in order to contribute to sustainable river management over the long term. Second, ProME promotes collaborative learning and adaptation by standardizing the sampling design for the field surveys at multiple projects and by disseminating findings across stakeholders. Third, ProME verifies to what extent restoration has been achieved, i.e., it must quantify the size and direction of change. Fourth, ProME identifies why the observed effects were present, thereby improving our mechanistic understanding of river functioning. We conclude with potential extensions of the framework (e.g., evaluating cumulative effects of projects within a catchment). Our conceptual framework presents a structured approach toward a more systematic learning and evidence‐based action in river restoration, while taking into account the wider picture of environmental change within which river restoration projects will inevitably operate. WIREs Water 2018, 5:e1257. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1257 This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Water and Life > Methods Abstract : Programmatic monitoring and evaluation of river restoration projects (ProME) builds on standardised surveys and systematic cross‐project comparison. ProME allows for collaborative learning, transfer of results across restoration projects and for adaptive management and monitoring. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Volume 5:Number 1(2018)
- Journal:
- Wiley interdisciplinary reviews
- Issue:
- Volume 5:Number 1(2018)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 5, Issue 1 (2018)
- Year:
- 2018
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2018-0005-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- n/a
- Page End:
- n/a
- Publication Date:
- 2017-10-29
- Subjects:
- Hydrology -- Periodicals
553.705 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)2049-1948 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/wat2.1257 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2049-1948
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9317.862700
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22515.xml