The Norm, the Normal and the Pathological: Articulating Honneth's Account of Normativity with a French Philosophy of the Norm (Foucault and Canguilhem). Issue 1 (2nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Genel, Katia
• Is Part Of: Critical horizons. Volume 22:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 70
• Page End: 88
• Publication Date: 2021-01-02
• Subjects: Critique -- norm -- normality -- normativity -- pathology -- power -- organism; Critical theory -- Periodicals; 142.05
• DOI: 10.1080/14409917.2019.1616482
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1440-9917

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Axel Honneth deploys the categories of normal and pathological to explain contemporary society in organic terms. This article concerns itself with how these medical references function in Honneth's work to explain the social world, and what their political implications are. For Honneth, social normality is a normative resource, even if it is only accessible through the study of pathology. Socially accepted norms are taken to reflect legitimate principles, with the early Honneth taking pathology as an individual psychic suffering that results from injustice, and the later Honneth taking pathology as an overextension of the logic of one social sphere (e.g. law) into the terrain of another (e.g. ethics). The implications of Honneth's organic account of society are explored through the lens of a competing "French" account of the norm offered by Canguilhem and Foucault. These French thinkers view socially accepted norms not as reflecting legitimate principles, but as standardizing processes of normalization that stifle normativities that do not conform. It is suggested that Honneth's account of normativity must be articulated with Canguilhem's and Foucault's account of normalization. That said, through the course of the analysis, several unexpected continuities are discovered between these two different traditions.