On adaptation cost and tractability in robust adaptive radiation therapy optimization. Issue 7 (22nd May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Böck, Michelle
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 47:Issue 7(2020)
• Page Start: 2791
• Page End: 2804
• Publication Date: 2020-05-22
• Subjects: adaptive radiation therapy -- Bayesian inference -- interfractional variations -- robust optimization -- scenario reduction -- stochastic programming; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/mp.14167
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: In this paper, a framework for online robust adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is discussed and evaluated. The purpose of the presented approach to ART is to: (a) handle interfractional geometric variations following a probability distribution different from the a priori hypothesis, (b) address adaptation cost, and (c) address computational tractability. Methods: A novel framework for online robust ART using the concept of Bayesian inference and scenario reduction is introduced and evaluated in a series of simulated cases on a one‐dimensional phantom geometry. The initial robust plan is generated from a robust optimization problem based on either expected‐value or worst‐case optimization approach using the a priori hypothesis of the probability distribution governing the interfractional geometric variations. Throughout the course of treatment, the simulated interfractional variations are evaluated in terms of their likelihood with respect to the a priori hypothesis of their distribution and violation of user‐specified tolerance limits by the accumulated dose. If an adaptation is considered, the a posteriori distribution is computed from the actual variations using Bayesian inference. Then, the adapted plan is optimized to better suit the actual interfractional variations of the individual case. This adapted plan is used until the next adaptation is triggered. To address adaptation cost, the proposed framework provides an option for increased adaptation frequency. Computational tractability in robust planning and ART is addressed by an approximation algorithm to reduce the size of the optimization problem. Results: According to the simulations, the proposed framework may improve target coverage compared to the corresponding nonadaptive robust approach. In particular, Bayesian inference may be useful to individualize plans to the actual interfractional variations. Concerning adaptation cost, the results indicate that mathematical methods like Bayesian inference may have a greater impact on improving individual treatment quality than increased adaptation frequency. In addition, the simulations suggest that the concept of scenario reduction may be useful to address computational tractability in ART and robust planning in general. Conclusions: The simulations indicate that the adapted plans may improve target coverage and OAR protection at manageable adaptation and computational cost within the novel framework. In particular, adaptive strategies using Bayesian inference appear to perform best among all strategies. This proof‐of‐concept study provides insights into the mathematical aspects of robustness, tractability, and ART, which are a useful guide for further development of frameworks for online robust ART.