Multi-center nationwide comparison of seven serology assays reveals a SARS-CoV-2 non-responding seronegative subpopulation. (December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Multi-center nationwide comparison of seven serology assays reveals a SARS-CoV-2 non-responding seronegative subpopulation. (December 2020)
- Main Title:
- Multi-center nationwide comparison of seven serology assays reveals a SARS-CoV-2 non-responding seronegative subpopulation
- Authors:
- Oved, Kfir
Olmer, Liraz
Shemer-Avni, Yonat
Wolf, Tamar
Supino-Rosin, Lia
Prajgrod, George
Shenhar, Yotam
Payorsky, Irina
Cohen, Yuval
Kohn, Yishai
Indenbaum, Victoria
Lazar, Rachel
Geylis, Valeria
Oikawa, Michal Tepperberg
Shinar, Eilat
Stoyanov, Evgeniy
Keinan-Boker, Lital
Bassal, Ravit
Reicher, Shay
Yishai, Ruti
Bar-Chaim, Adina
Doolman, Ram
Reiter, Yoram
Mendelson, Ella
Livneh, Zvi
Freedman, Laurence S.
Lustig, Yaniv - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: An Israeli national taskforce performed a multi-center clinical and analytical validation of seven serology assays to determine their utility and limitations for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Methods: Serology assays from Roche, Abbott, Diasorin, BioMerieux, Beckman-Coulter, Siemens, and an in-house RBD ELISA were included. Negative samples from 2391 individuals representative of the Israeli population, and 698 SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients, collected between March and May 2020, were analyzed Findings: Immunoassays sensitivities between 81.5%-89.4% and specificities between 97.7%-100% resulted in a profound impact on the expected Positive Predictive Value (PPV) in low (<15%) prevalence scenarios. No meaningful increase was detected in the false positive rate in children compared to adults. A positive correlation between disease severity and antibody titers, and no decrease in antibody titers in the first 8 weeks after PCR positivity was observed. We identified a subgroup of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (~5% of patients), who remained seronegative across a wide range of antigens, isotypes, and technologies. Interpretation: The commercially available automated immunoassays exhibit significant differences in performance and expected PPV in low prevalence scenarios. The low false-positivity rate in under 20′s suggests that cross-reactive immunity from previous CoV strains is unlikely to explain the milder disease course in children. Finding noAbstract: Background: An Israeli national taskforce performed a multi-center clinical and analytical validation of seven serology assays to determine their utility and limitations for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. Methods: Serology assays from Roche, Abbott, Diasorin, BioMerieux, Beckman-Coulter, Siemens, and an in-house RBD ELISA were included. Negative samples from 2391 individuals representative of the Israeli population, and 698 SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive patients, collected between March and May 2020, were analyzed Findings: Immunoassays sensitivities between 81.5%-89.4% and specificities between 97.7%-100% resulted in a profound impact on the expected Positive Predictive Value (PPV) in low (<15%) prevalence scenarios. No meaningful increase was detected in the false positive rate in children compared to adults. A positive correlation between disease severity and antibody titers, and no decrease in antibody titers in the first 8 weeks after PCR positivity was observed. We identified a subgroup of symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positive patients (~5% of patients), who remained seronegative across a wide range of antigens, isotypes, and technologies. Interpretation: The commercially available automated immunoassays exhibit significant differences in performance and expected PPV in low prevalence scenarios. The low false-positivity rate in under 20′s suggests that cross-reactive immunity from previous CoV strains is unlikely to explain the milder disease course in children. Finding no decrease in antibody titers in the first 8 weeks is in contrast to some reports of short half-life for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The ~5% who were seronegative non-responders, using multiple assays in a population-wide manner, represents the proportion of patients that may be at risk for re-infection. Funding: Israel Ministry of Health. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- EClinicalMedicine. Volume 29/30(2020)
- Journal:
- EClinicalMedicine
- Issue:
- Volume 29/30(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 29/30, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 29/30
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-NaN-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- Serology -- SARS-CoV-2 -- Antibodies -- Validation study -- Seronegative subpopulation -- IgG
Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
Medical policy -- Periodicals
Clinical Medicine
Health Policy
Public Health
Medical policy
Medicine -- Research
Periodical
Electronic journals
Periodicals
613 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/25895370 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100651 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2589-5370
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22517.xml