Chronic versus recent expressive suppression burdens are differentially associated with cognitive performance among older adults. Issue 8 (13th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Suchy, Yana; Brothers, Stacey; Mullen, Christine M.; Niermeyer, Madison A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology. Volume 42:Issue 8(2020)
• Page Start: 834
• Page End: 848
• Publication Date: 2020-09-13
• Subjects: Executive functioning -- expressive suppression -- errors -- speed -- aging -- emotion regulation -- Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System -- assessment; Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; 616.89
• DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2020.1817862
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1380-3395

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Introduction : Expressive suppression (ES; suppression of affective behavior) has been shown to have a deleterious impact on subsequently administered tests of executive functions (EF), threatening validity, and reliability of EF assessment. Past research has shown that recent ES (i.e., across 24 hours prior to testing) and chronic ES (i.e., across 2 weeks prior to testing) have differential impact on test performance. The present study compared the association of chronic vs. recent ES with speed vs. accuracy of performance on tests of EF and tests of lower-order processes. Method: Participants were 255 community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and older. Participants completed timed subtests of the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System and the Burden of State Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Results: Hierarchical linear regressions examined the contributions of chronic vs. recent ES to test performance. Recent ES was related to scores of both speed and accuracy on EF tests. The association between recent ES and EF errors held beyond covariates (i.e., chronic ES, demographics, depression, and general cognitive status). In contrast, the association between recent ES and EF speed was fully explained by EF error scores. Chronic ES was associated only with speed of performance and only on lower-order tasks, but this relationship did not survive correction for cognitive, psychiatric, and demographic factors. Conclusions: Recent ES appears to be a risk factor for EF lapses. Chronic ES, while related to performance speed, seems to also relate to several other cognitive, psychiatric, and demographic factors, which themselves explain slower information processing.