Theorizing the resilience district: Design-based decision making for coastal climate change adaptation. Issue 1 (2nd January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Berger, Alan M.; Wilson, Michael; Susskind, Jonah; Zeckhauser, Richard J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of landscape architecture. Volume 15:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 6
• Page End: 17
• Publication Date: 2020-01-02
• Subjects: Climate change -- coastal flooding -- risk -- resilience districts; Landscape architecture -- Periodicals; Architecture du paysage -- Périodiques; Landscape architecture; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 712.05
• DOI: 10.1080/18626033.2020.1792648
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1862-6033

Abstract

Abstract: Today, coastal cities face mounting pressures to plan for increased exposure to chronic flooding, and ultimately significant sea level rise. The required investments in urban adaptation are inherently expensive, uncertain and long-term. These factors pose significant challenges for both effective choice and collective action. This paper argues that metropolitan 'resilience districts' offer the appropriate decision-making unit (DMU) to analyze, plan and implement resilience strategies. The working concept of 'resilience districts' for urban areas vulnerable to coastal flooding was first coined by a design team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology spurred by a case study on the New Jersey Meadowlands from the 'Rebuild By Design' (RBD) competition. Cities have since begun using this term for their own resilience policies, failing to recognize the original intentions of its meaning. This analysis details a resilience districting strategy for the Greater Boston Metropolitan Area. The research culminates with a generalizable urban planning and design framework for protecting critical infrastructure, 'thickening' regional soft systems and transferring density to less vulnerable areas. The overall theme emphasizes landscape as a critical public safety service.