What factors are most influential in increasing cervical cancer screening attendance? An online study of UK-based women. Issue 1 (1st January 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilding, Sarah; Wighton, Sarah; Halligan, Daisy; West, Robert; Conner, Mark; O'Connor, Daryl B.
• Is Part Of: Health psychology and behavioral medicine. Volume 8:Issue 1(2020)
• Page Start: 314
• Page End: 328
• Publication Date: 2020-01-01
• Subjects: Cervical cancer screening -- decision making -- decision making in cervical cancer screening -- barrier -- facilitator; Clinical health psychology -- Periodicals; Medicine and psychology -- Periodicals; 613.09
• DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2020.1798239
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2164-2850

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective : Cervical cancer is the fourth most commonly occurring cancer in women worldwide. The UK has one of the highest cervical screening rates in Europe, yet attendance has been decreasing. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to screening attendance and assess the perceived importance of these factors. Methods : 194 women living in the UK were recruited via an online research recruitment website to an online survey. Most participants ( N = 128, 66.0%) were currently up-to-date with cervical screening, 66 participants (34.0%) had never been screened, or were overdue for screening. Participants identified barriers and facilitators to cervical screening attendance via free-text responses and were also asked to rate a list of factors as most to least influential over decision making. Results were analysed using thematic content analysis and ratings analysed using multivariable analyses. Results : The most commonly reported barriers were: Pain/discomfort; Embarrassment; and Time. These were also rated as most influential for decision making. The most commonly reported facilitators were: Ease of making appointments; Peace of mind; and Fear of cancer/preventing serious illness. While importance rating of barriers did not differ by previous screening behaviour, ratings of some facilitators significantly differed. Up-to-date women rated believing screening is potentially life-saving and part of personal responsibility as significantly more important than overdue/never screened women. Conclusion : This study confirmed that factors which encourage screening are key to the decision of whether to attend screening. Women suggested several improvements that might make attending easier and improve uptake, including flexibility of screening locations to fit around work hours and childcare arrangements. Psychological facilitators included the peace of mind that screening brings and the belief that cervical cancer screening is potentially life-saving. Public health interventions should target factors which facilitate screening and how these interplay with barriers in order to improve uptake.