Novel flat-panel cone-beam CT compared to multi-detector CT for assessment of acute ischemic stroke: A prospective study. Issue 138 (May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nicholson, Patrick; Cancelliere, Nicole M.; Bracken, John; Hummel, Erik; van Nijnatten, Fred; Withagen, Paul; van de Haar, Peter; Hallacoglu, Bertan; van Vlimmeren, Marijke; Agid, Ronit; Krings, Timo; Mendes Pereira, Vitor
• Is Part Of: European journal of radiology. Issue 138(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-05
• Subjects: Stroke -- Advanced imaging -- Cone-beam CT -- Computed tomography -- Image quality; Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Radiologie médicale -- Périodiques; Medical radiology; Periodicals; 616.075705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109645
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0720-048X

Abstract

Highlights: Cone-beam CT (CBCT) can be performed in the angiosuite for the assessment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Image quality (IQ) developments improved assessment of brain parenchyma that was not achievable with older CBCT technology. Continued IQ improvements may allow for the eventual primary use of CBCT for the evaluation of selected AIS patients. Abstract: Purpose: Cone beam CT (CBCT) imaging assessment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) in the angiosuite may improve stroke workflow and decrease time to recanalization. In order for this workflow to gain widespread acceptance, current CBCT imaging needs further development to improve image quality. Our study aimed to compare the image quality of a new CBCT protocol performed directly in the angiosuite with imaging from multidetector CT as a gold standard. Methods: AIS patients with an LVO who were candidates for endovascular treatment were prospectively included in this study. Following conventional multidetector CT (MDCT), patients underwent unenhanced cone beam CT (XperCT, Philips) imaging in the angiosuite, using two different protocols: a standard 20.8 s XperCT and/or an improved 10.4 s XperCT protocol. Images were evaluated using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Results: We included 65 patients in the study. Patients received CBCT imaging prior to endovascular treatment; 18 patients were assessed with a standard 20.8 s protocol scans and 47 with a newer 10.4 s scan. The quantitative analysis showed that the mean contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was significantly higher for the newer 10.4 s protocol compared with the 20.8 s protocol (2.08 +/- 0.64 vs. 1.15 +/- 0.27, p < 0.004) and the mean image noise was significantly lower for the 10.4 s XperCTs when compared with the 20.8 s XperCTs (6.30 +/- 1.34 vs. 7.82 +/- 2.03, p=<0.003). Qualitative analysis, including 6 measures of image quality, demonstrated that 74.1 % of the 10.4 s XperCT scans were ranked as 'Acceptable' for assessing parenchymal imaging in AIS patients(scoring 3–5 points on a 5-point Likert-scale), compared with 32.4 % of the standard 20.8 s XperCT and 100 % of the MDCT scans. Compared to the MDCT studies, 83 % of the 10.4 s XperCT scans were deemed sufficient image quality for a direct-to-angiosuite selection, compared to only 11 % for the standard 20.8 s scans. The largest image quality improvements included grey/white matter differentiation (59 % improvement), and reduction of image noise and artefacts (63 % & 50 % improvement, respectively). Conclusions: Continued advances in cone-beam CT allow marked improvements in image quality for the assessment of brain parenchyma, which supports a direct-to-angiosuite approach for AIS patients eligible for thrombectomy treatment.