Same-Admission Microvascular Maxillofacial Ballistic Trauma Reconstruction Using Virtual Surgical Planning: A Case Series and Systematic Review. Issue 3 (September 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Same-Admission Microvascular Maxillofacial Ballistic Trauma Reconstruction Using Virtual Surgical Planning: A Case Series and Systematic Review. Issue 3 (September 2022)
- Main Title:
- Same-Admission Microvascular Maxillofacial Ballistic Trauma Reconstruction Using Virtual Surgical Planning: A Case Series and Systematic Review
- Authors:
- Knudson, Sean A.
Day, Kristopher M.
Kelley, Patrick
Padilla, Pablo
Collier, Ian X.
Henry, Steven
Harshbarger, Raymond
Combs, Patrick - Abstract:
- Study Design: Retrospective case series; systematic review. Objective: It is unknown whether the use of virtual surgical planning (VSP) to facilitate same-admission microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible following acute maxillofacial ballistic trauma (MBT) is sufficient to achieve definitive reconstruction and functional occlusion. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted for patients who underwent microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible using VSP after acute MBT. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were systematically reviewed using blinded screening. Studies were evaluated via thematic analysis. Results: Five patients were treated by same-admission and microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible using VSP. We observed an average of 16.4 ± 9.1 days between initial presentation and reconstruction, an average length of stay of 51.6 ± 17.9 days, 6.2 ± 2.8 operations, and 1.6 ± 0.9 free flaps per patient. Four types and 8 total flaps were employed, most commonly the anterior lateral thigh flap (37.5%). Care yielded complete flap survival. Each patient experienced at least 1 minor complication. All patients achieved centric occlusion, oral nutrition, and an approximation of their baseline facial aesthetic. Follow up was 191.0 ± 183.9 weeks. Systematic review produced 8 articles that adhered to inclusion criteria. Consensus themes in the literature were found for clinical goal and function of VSP when practicing MBTStudy Design: Retrospective case series; systematic review. Objective: It is unknown whether the use of virtual surgical planning (VSP) to facilitate same-admission microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible following acute maxillofacial ballistic trauma (MBT) is sufficient to achieve definitive reconstruction and functional occlusion. Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted for patients who underwent microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible using VSP after acute MBT. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, ScienceDirect, and Scopus databases were systematically reviewed using blinded screening. Studies were evaluated via thematic analysis. Results: Five patients were treated by same-admission and microsurgical reconstruction of the mandible using VSP. We observed an average of 16.4 ± 9.1 days between initial presentation and reconstruction, an average length of stay of 51.6 ± 17.9 days, 6.2 ± 2.8 operations, and 1.6 ± 0.9 free flaps per patient. Four types and 8 total flaps were employed, most commonly the anterior lateral thigh flap (37.5%). Care yielded complete flap survival. Each patient experienced at least 1 minor complication. All patients achieved centric occlusion, oral nutrition, and an approximation of their baseline facial aesthetic. Follow up was 191.0 ± 183.9 weeks. Systematic review produced 8 articles that adhered to inclusion criteria. Consensus themes in the literature were found for clinical goal and function of VSP when practicing MBT reconstruction, yet disagreement was found surrounding optimal treatment timeline. Conclusions: Same-admission microsurgical reconstruction after MBT is safe and effective to re-establish mandibular form and function. VSP did not delay reconstruction, given the need for preparation prior to definitive reconstruction. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction. Volume 15:Issue 3(2022)
- Journal:
- Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction
- Issue:
- Volume 15:Issue 3(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 15, Issue 3 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0015-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 206
- Page End:
- 218
- Publication Date:
- 2022-09
- Subjects:
- ballistic -- maxillofacial -- trauma -- microsurgery -- virtual surgery
Face -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals
Face -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Maxilla -- Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals
Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Face -- Surgery
Face -- Wounds and injuries
Maxilla -- Surgery
Maxilla -- Wounds and injuries
Maxillofacial Injuries -- Periodicals
Craniocerebral Trauma -- Periodicals
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- methods -- Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
Periodicals
617.522 - Journal URLs:
- https://journals.sagepub.com/home/cmt ↗
http://mclink.library.mcgill.ca/sfx?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/sfxit.com:opac_856&url_ctx_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&sfx.ignore_date_threshold=1&rft.object_id=1000000000429288&svc_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:sch_svc& ↗
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/1449/ ↗
http://resolver.library.ualberta.ca/resolver?ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fualberta.ca%3Aopac&rft.genre=journal&rft.object_id=1000000000429287&rft.issn=1943-3875&rft.eissn=1943-3883&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&url_ctx_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Actx&url_ver=Z39.88-2004 ↗
https://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/journal/10.1055/s-00032027 ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/19433875211026432 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1943-3875
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22456.xml