Cardiovascular risk management in patients with severe mental illness or taking antipsychotics: A qualitative study on barriers and facilitators among dutch general practitioners. Issue 1 (31st December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jakobs, Kirsti; Lautan, Latoya; Lucassen, Peter; Janzing, Joost; van Lieshout, Jan; Biermans, Marion C. J.; Bischoff, Erik W. M. A.
• Is Part Of: European journal of general practice. Volume 28:Issue 1(2022)
• Page Start: 191
• Page End: 199
• Publication Date: 2022-12-31
• Subjects: Primary care -- qualitative research -- severe mental illness -- antipsychotics -- cardiovascular risk; Family medicine -- Periodicals; 362.172
• DOI: 10.1080/13814788.2022.2092093
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1381-4788

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Patients with severe mental illness (SMI) or receiving treatment with antipsychotics (APs) have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular risk management (CVRM) increasingly depends on general practitioners (GPs) because of the shift of mental healthcare from secondary to primary care and the surge of off-label AP prescriptions. Nevertheless, the uptake of patients with SMI/APs in CVRM programmes in Dutch primary care is low. Objectives: To explore which barriers and facilitators GPs foresee when including and treating patients with SMI or using APs in an existing CVRM programme. Methods: In 2019, we conducted a qualitative study among 13 Dutch GPs. During individual in-depth, semi-structured interviews a computer-generated list of eligible patients who lacked annual cardiovascular risk (CVR) screening guided the interview. Data was analysed thematically. Results: The main barriers identified were: (i) underestimation of patient CVR and ambivalence to apply risk-lowering strategies such as smoking cessation, (ii) disproportionate burden on GPs in deprived areas, (iii) poor information exchange between GPs and psychiatrists, and (iv) scepticism about patient compliance, especially those with more complex conditions. The main facilitators included: (i) support of GPs through a computer-generated list of eligible patients and (ii) involvement of family or carers. Conclusion: This study displays a range of barriers and facilitators anticipated by GPs. These indicate the preconditions required to remove barriers and facilitate GPs, namely adequate recommendations in practice guidelines, improved consultation opportunities with psychiatrists, practical advice to support patient adherence and incentives for practices in deprived areas.