Non‐surgical transfer of vitrified porcine embryos using a catheter designed for a proximal site of the uterus. (21st September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hirayama, Yuri; Takishita, Rie; Misawa, Hiroyasu; Kikuchi, Kazuhiro; Misumi, Koji; Egawa, Sachiko; Motoyama, Sawako; Hasuta, Yasunobu; Nakamura, Yoshiyuki; Hashiyada, Yutaka
• Is Part Of: Animal science journal. Volume 91:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-09-21
• Subjects: catheter -- embryo transfer -- non‐surgical -- pig -- vitrification; Animal culture -- Periodicals; Livestock -- Periodicals; 636
• DOI: 10.1111/asj.13457
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1344-3941

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to compare the efficiency of non‐surgical embryo transfer (ET) using a newly developed catheter, which enables transferring embryos into a proximal site of the uterus (mostly uterine body), and surgical ET of vitrified porcine embryos. In Experiment 1, the catheter was inserted into 12 gilts, with each half of the group allocated to skilled or novice operators. The time required for insertion into the uterus did not differ between skilled and novice operators (4 min 9 s and 4 min 6 s, respectively). In Experiment 2, 12 gilts were used as recipients for non‐surgical and surgical ET with vitrified embryos ( n = 6, each). There was no significant difference in the rate of piglet production based on the number of transferred embryos between surgical and non‐surgical ET (25.8% vs. 15.4%, p = .098). The results suggest that non‐surgical ET catheter allowed for easy insertion and transfer of embryos without special training. Although the catheter is effective for deposition of embryos into the proximal site of uterus, the efficiency of piglet production is not enhanced compared with surgical ET. The ET method using this catheter, being labor‐saving and less‐invasive, may contribute to the improvement of ET in pigs.