Comparison of two models to estimate genetic parameters for number of born alive in pigs. (14th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Konta, Ayane; Ogawa, Shinichiro; Kimata, Makoto; Ishii, Kazuo; Uemoto, Yoshinobu; Satoh, Masahiro
• Is Part Of: Animal science journal. Volume 91:Number 1(2020)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2020-07-14
• Subjects: genetic parameter estimation -- Landrace -- Large White -- number of born alive -- permanent environmental effect; Animal culture -- Periodicals; Livestock -- Periodicals; 636
• DOI: 10.1111/asj.13417
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1344-3941

Abstract

Abstract: The performance of the two‐trait animal model that regards the first parity and later parities as two different traits in estimating genetic parameters for number of born alive (NBA) was examined using real and simulated data. Genetic parameters for NBA were estimated in purebred Landrace and Large White pigs using a single‐trait repeatability model (Model 1) that regards all parities as the same trait and a two‐trait animal model (Model 2) that regards the first and the later parities as different traits. For Model 2, the permanent environmental effect was fitted to only the records of the later parities. Heritability for NBA estimated using Model 1 was 0.12 for Landrace and 0.11 for Large White. Estimated heritability for NBA of the first parity and the later parities was 0.21 and 0.16, respectively, for Landrace; 0.18 and 0.16, respectively, for Large White obtained using Model 2, and higher than those in both breeds obtained using Model 1. Further results based on data simulated using the Monte Carlo method suggest that estimated additive genetic variance could be more biased using Model 2 than Model 1.