Development and validation of a Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN‐HN) in a scarce resource setting: Response to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Issue 22 (11th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Almeida, John R.; Noel, Christopher W.; Forner, David; Zhang, Han; Nichols, Anthony C.; Cohen, Marc A.; Wong, Richard J.; McMullen, Caitlin; Graboyes, Evan M.; Divi, Vasu; Shuman, Andrew G.; Rosko, Andrew J.; Lewis, Carol M.; Hanna, Ehab Y.; Myers, Jeffrey; Paleri, Vinidh; Miles, Brett; Genden, Eric; Eskander, Antoine; Enepekides, Danny J.; Higgins, Kevin M.; Brown, Dale; Chepeha, Douglas B.; Witterick, Ian J.; Gullane, Patrick J.; Irish, Jonathan C.; Monteiro, Eric; Goldstein, David P.; Gilbert, Ralph
• Is Part Of: Cancer. Volume 126:Issue 22(2020)
• Page Start: 4895
• Page End: 4904
• Publication Date: 2020-08-11
• Subjects: coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) -- delivery of health care -- head and neck cancer -- health priorities -- patient selection -- surgical procedures -- waiting lists; Cancer -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Cytopathology -- Periodicals; 616.99405
• DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33114
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0008-543X

Abstract

Abstract : Background: In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, access to surgical care for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is limited and unpredictable. Determining which patients should be prioritized is inherently subjective and difficult to assess. The authors have proposed an algorithm to fairly and consistently triage patients and mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes. Methods: Two separate expert panels, a consensus panel (11 participants) and a validation panel (15 participants), were constructed among international HNC surgeons. Using a modified Delphi process and RAND Corporation/University of California at Los Angeles methodology with 4 consensus rounds and 2 meetings, groupings of high‐priority, intermediate‐priority, and low‐priority indications for surgery were established and subdivided. A point‐based scoring algorithm was developed, the Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN‐HN). Agreement was measured during consensus and for algorithm scoring using the Krippendorff alpha. Rankings from the algorithm were compared with expert rankings of 12 case vignettes using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. Results: A total of 62 indications for surgical priority were rated. Weights for each indication ranged from −4 to +4 (scale range; −17 to 20). The response rate for the validation exercise was 100%. The SPARTAN‐HN demonstrated excellent agreement and correlation with expert rankings (Krippendorff alpha, .91 [95% CI, 0.88‐0.93]; and rho, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.45‐0.95]). Conclusions: The SPARTAN‐HN surgical prioritization algorithm consistently stratifies patients requiring HNC surgical care in the COVID‐19 era. Formal evaluation and implementation are required. Lay Summary: Many countries have enacted strict rules regarding the use of hospital resources during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Facing delays in surgery, patients may experience worse functional outcomes, stage migration, and eventual inoperability. Treatment prioritization tools have shown benefit in helping to triage patients equitably with minimal provider cognitive burden. The current study sought to develop what to the authors' knowledge is the first cancer–specific surgical prioritization tool for use in the COVID‐19 era, the Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN‐HN). This algorithm consistently stratifies patients requiring head and neck cancer surgery in the COVID‐19 era and provides evidence for the initial uptake of the SPARTAN‐HN. Abstract : To the authors' knowledge, the Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN‐HN) is the first cancer surgery–specific prioritization tool for use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The SPARTAN‐HN algorithm is reliable and valid for the stratification of patients with head and neck cancer who require urgent cancer care in resource‐restricted practice environments.