Local Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. (17th March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Local Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial. (17th March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Local Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial
- Authors:
- Ruers, Theo
Van Coevorden, Frits
Punt, Cornelis J A
Pierie, Jean-Pierre E N
Borel-Rinkes, Inne
Ledermann, Jonathan A
Poston, Graeme
Bechstein, Wolf
Lentz, Marie-Ange
Mauer, Murielle
Folprecht, Gunnar
Van Cutsem, Eric
Ducreux, Michel
Nordlinger, Bernard - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Tumor ablation is often employed for unresectable colorectal liver metastases. However, no survival benefit hasever been demonstrated in prospective randomized studies. Here, we investigate the long-term benefits of such an aggressive approach. Methods: In this randomized phase II trial, 119 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (n < 10 and no extrahepatic disease) received systemic treatment alone or systemic treatment plus aggressive local treatment by radiofrequency ablation ± resection. Previously, we reported that the primary end point (30-month overall survival [OS] > 38%) was met. We now report on long-term OS results. All statistical tests were two-sided. The analyses were according to intention to treat. Results: At a median follow up of 9.7 years, 92 of 119 (77.3%) patients had died: 39 of 60 (65.0%) in the combined modality arm and 53 of 59 (89.8%) in the systemic treatment arm. Almost all patients died of progressive disease (35 patients in the combined modality arm, 49 patients in the systemic treatment arm). There was a statistically significant difference in OS in favor of the combined modality arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38 to 0.88, P = .01). Three-, five-, and eight-year OS were 56.9% (95% CI = 43.3% to 68.5%), 43.1% (95% CI = 30.3% to 55.3%), 35.9% (95% CI = 23.8% to 48.2%), respectively, in the combined modality arm and 55.2% (95% CI = 41.6% to 66.9%), 30.3% (95% CI = 19.0% toAbstract: Background: Tumor ablation is often employed for unresectable colorectal liver metastases. However, no survival benefit hasever been demonstrated in prospective randomized studies. Here, we investigate the long-term benefits of such an aggressive approach. Methods: In this randomized phase II trial, 119 patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (n < 10 and no extrahepatic disease) received systemic treatment alone or systemic treatment plus aggressive local treatment by radiofrequency ablation ± resection. Previously, we reported that the primary end point (30-month overall survival [OS] > 38%) was met. We now report on long-term OS results. All statistical tests were two-sided. The analyses were according to intention to treat. Results: At a median follow up of 9.7 years, 92 of 119 (77.3%) patients had died: 39 of 60 (65.0%) in the combined modality arm and 53 of 59 (89.8%) in the systemic treatment arm. Almost all patients died of progressive disease (35 patients in the combined modality arm, 49 patients in the systemic treatment arm). There was a statistically significant difference in OS in favor of the combined modality arm (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.38 to 0.88, P = .01). Three-, five-, and eight-year OS were 56.9% (95% CI = 43.3% to 68.5%), 43.1% (95% CI = 30.3% to 55.3%), 35.9% (95% CI = 23.8% to 48.2%), respectively, in the combined modality arm and 55.2% (95% CI = 41.6% to 66.9%), 30.3% (95% CI = 19.0% to 42.4%), 8.9% (95% CI = 3.3% to 18.1%), respectively, in the systemic treatment arm. Median OS was 45.6 months (95% CI = 30.3 to 67.8 months) in the combined modality arm vs 40.5 months (95% CI = 27.5 to 47.7 months) in the systemic treatment arm. Conclusions: This phase II trial is the first randomized study demonstrating that aggressive local treatment can prolong OS in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Volume 109:Number 9(2017)
- Journal:
- Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Issue:
- Volume 109:Number 9(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 9 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0109-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03-17
- Subjects:
- Cancer -- Periodicals
Cancer -- Research -- Periodicals
616.994 - Journal URLs:
- https://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗
http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/jnci/djx015 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0027-8874
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4830.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22427.xml