Framing and reframing R2P—a responsibility to protect humanity from evil. Issue 6 (18th September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Framing and reframing R2P—a responsibility to protect humanity from evil. Issue 6 (18th September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Framing and reframing R2P—a responsibility to protect humanity from evil
- Authors:
- Royer, Christof
- Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: This article takes issue with de-politicised and moralistic conceptions of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and, inspired by the political theory of Hannah Arendt, develops a 're-politicised' and 'de-moralised' account of R2P. It argues that by relying on a link between a moral responsibility to 'save strangers' and practical political action, R2P turns a blind eye to the political interest of powerful actors. And by trying to transform R2P into a 'blueprint', 'roadmap' or 'emergency plan' for political action, many commentators try to render obsolete political deliberation and practical judgement on a case-by-case basis. The present article argues that it is necessary to develop a more realistic view of R2P's role and potential in world politics. R2P, it is argued, has an important discursive function and considerable potential to influence and guide international decision-making processes. Drawing on Arendt's conception of 'evil' as a crime against humanity itself, this article reframes R2P as a 'responsibility to protect humanity from evil'. An Arendtian understanding of mass atrocities as crimes against our common humanity (i.e. as evils) facilitates the development of a re-politicised and de-moralised account of R2P: This account recognises its discursive role, it actively seeks to generate political interest for action in the face of harrowing mass atrocities but also acts as a leash on intervention in less severe cases. Abbreviation R2P: Responsibility toABSTRACT: This article takes issue with de-politicised and moralistic conceptions of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and, inspired by the political theory of Hannah Arendt, develops a 're-politicised' and 'de-moralised' account of R2P. It argues that by relying on a link between a moral responsibility to 'save strangers' and practical political action, R2P turns a blind eye to the political interest of powerful actors. And by trying to transform R2P into a 'blueprint', 'roadmap' or 'emergency plan' for political action, many commentators try to render obsolete political deliberation and practical judgement on a case-by-case basis. The present article argues that it is necessary to develop a more realistic view of R2P's role and potential in world politics. R2P, it is argued, has an important discursive function and considerable potential to influence and guide international decision-making processes. Drawing on Arendt's conception of 'evil' as a crime against humanity itself, this article reframes R2P as a 'responsibility to protect humanity from evil'. An Arendtian understanding of mass atrocities as crimes against our common humanity (i.e. as evils) facilitates the development of a re-politicised and de-moralised account of R2P: This account recognises its discursive role, it actively seeks to generate political interest for action in the face of harrowing mass atrocities but also acts as a leash on intervention in less severe cases. Abbreviation R2P: Responsibility to Protect; UN: United Nations; NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organisation; ICISS: International Committee on Intervention and State Sovereignty … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Critical review of international social and political philosophy. Volume 23:Issue 6(2020)
- Journal:
- Critical review of international social and political philosophy
- Issue:
- Volume 23:Issue 6(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 23, Issue 6 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 23
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0023-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 659
- Page End:
- 682
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09-18
- Subjects:
- Responsibility to protect -- de-politicisation -- evil -- common humanity -- political interest -- license and leash
Political science -- Philosophy -- Periodicals
Policy sciences -- Philosophy -- Periodicals
Social sciences -- Philosophy -- Periodicals
320.01 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fcri20/current ↗
http://www.tandfonline.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1080/13698230.2018.1479818 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1369-8230
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3487.477600
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22431.xml