Is "Vicarious Retribution Model" Sufficient to Analyse Anti-Muslim Hate Crimes?. Issue 4 (1st October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kara, Seyfeddin; Merali, Arzu
• Is Part Of: Journal of Muslim minority affairs. Volume 40:Issue 4(2020)
• Page Start: 671
• Page End: 693
• Publication Date: 2020-10-01
• Subjects: Islamophobia -- racism -- terrorism -- British Muslims -- anti-Muslim -- vicarious retribution -- domination -- discrimination -- hate crime -- trigger events -- PREVENT; Muslims -- Non-Muslim countries -- Periodicals; Islam -- Periodicals; Religious minorities -- Periodicals; 305.6971
• DOI: 10.1080/13602004.2020.1848152
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1360-2004

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to scrutinise the implementation of a "vicarious retribution model" on anti-Muslim hate crimes and suggests that despite its advantages, the model is not sufficient to provide a clear picture of hate crimes alone and needs a supporting model such as "the domination hate model of intercultural relations" (DHMIR) to give it a historical and socio-political context. Whilst a rigorous model of analysis, the "vicarious retribution model, " has been co-opted by institutions to explain the rise in hate crimes based on the assumption that the U.K. (and other countries investigated) have only experienced Islamophobia in the post 9–11 context. The IHRC surveys in the U.K. in 2010 and 2014, the occurrence of Brexit, and the post-referendum spike in hate crimes belie some of the foundations of the applicability of this model. Therefore, the study is an effort to understand anti-Muslim hate crimes through the use of the "vicarious retribution model" and the DHMIR.