Time‐effectiveness and convenience of transvaginal ultrasound probe disinfection using ultraviolet vs chlorine dioxide multistep wipe system: prospective survey study. (1st July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kyriacou, C.; Robinson, E.; Barcroft, J.; Parker, N.; Tuomey, M.; Stalder, C.; Gould, D.; Al‐Memar, M.; Bourne, T.
• Is Part Of: Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology. Volume 60:Number 1(2022)
• Page Start: 132
• Page End: 138
• Publication Date: 2022-07-01
• Subjects: chlorine dioxide -- gynecology -- health and safety -- ultrasonography -- ultraviolet; Ultrasonics in obstetrics -- Periodicals; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Diagnosis, Ultrasonic -- Periodicals; Genital Diseases, Female -- ultrasonography -- Periodicals; Ultrasonography, Prenatal -- Periodicals; 618.047543
• DOI: 10.1002/uog.24834
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0960-7692

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objectives: To compare the efficiency, ease of use and user satisfaction of two methods of transvaginal ultrasound probe high‐level disinfection: ultraviolet‐C radiation (UV‐C) and a chlorine dioxide multistep wipe system. Methods: This was a prospective survey study. UV‐C units were introduced into a busy early pregnancy assessment service and compared with a multiwipe system for disinfection. Before seeing each patient, healthcare professionals (HCPs) measured with a stopwatch the time taken to complete a cycle of disinfection using either UV‐C or chlorine dioxide multistep wipes and responded to a quick‐response (QR) code‐linked survey. Additional essential tasks that could be completed before seeing the next patient during probe disinfection were also documented. Using another QR code‐linked survey, data on ease of use, satisfaction with the system used and preferred system were collected. The ease of use and satisfaction with the system were rated on a 0 to 10 Likert scale (0 poor, 10 excellent). A free‐text section for comments was then completed. Results: Disinfection using UV‐C ( n = 331) was 60% faster than the chlorine dioxide multiwipe system ( n = 332) (101 vs 250 s; P < 0.0001). A greater number of tasks were completed during probe disinfection when using UV‐C, saving a further 74 s per patient ( P < 0.0001). The HCPs using UV‐C ( n = 71) reported greater ease of use (median Likert score, 10 vs 3; P < 0.0001) and satisfaction (median Likert score, 10 vs 2; P < 0.0001) compared with those using the multiwipe system ( n = 43). HCPs reported that the chlorine dioxide system was time‐consuming and environmentally unfriendly, while the UV‐C system was efficient and easy to use. Overall, 98% of the HCPs preferred using the UV‐C system. Conclusions: UV‐C technology is more time‐efficient and allows more essential tasks to be completed during disinfection. For a 4‐h ultrasound list of 15 patients, the use of UV‐C would save 55 min 45 s. HCPs found UV‐C preferable and easier to use. © 2021 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Abstract : Linked article: There is a comment on this article by Swinney et al. Click here to view the Correspondence.