Group‐based trajectory modeling of intracranial pressure in patients with acute brain injury: Results from multi‐center ICUs, 2008–2019. (25th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yang, Fan; Peng, Chi; Peng, Liwei; Wang, Peng; Cheng, Chao; Zuo, Wei; Zhao, Lei; Jin, Zhichao; Li, Weixin
• Is Part Of: CNS neuroscience & therapeutics. Volume 28:Number 8(2022)
• Page Start: 1218
• Page End: 1228
• Publication Date: 2022-05-25
• Subjects: clinical outcomes -- group‐based trajectory modeling -- hemorrhagic stroke -- intracranial pressure monitoring -- traumatic brain injury; Neuropharmacology -- Periodicals; Central nervous system -- Diseases -- Effect of drugs on -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/cns.13854
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-5930

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The objective of the study was to characterize the longitudinal, dynamic intracranial pressure (ICP) trajectory in acute brain injury (ABI) patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and explore whether it added sights over traditional thresholds in predicting outcomes. Methods: ABI patients with ICP monitoring were identified from two public databases named Medical Information Mart for the Intensive Care (MIMIC)‐IV and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU‐CRD). Group‐based trajectory modeling (GBTM) was employed to identify 4‐h ICP trajectories in days 0–5 post‐ICU admission. Then, logistic regression was used to compare clinical outcomes across distinct groups. To further validate previously reported thresholds, we created the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in our dataset. Results: A total of 810 eligible patients were ultimately enrolled in the study. GBTM analyses generated 6 distinct ICP trajectories, differing in the initial ICP, evolution pattern, and number/proportion of spikes >20/22 mmHg. Compared with patients in "the highest, declined then rose" trajectory, those belonging to the "lowest, stable, " "low, stable, " and "medium, stable" ICP trajectories were at lower risks of 30‐day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01, 0.21), (OR 0.04; 95% CI 0.01, 0.19), (OR 0.08; 95% CI 0.01, 0.42), respectively. ROC analysis demonstrated an unfavorable result, for example, 30‐day mortality in total cohort: an area under the curve (AUC): 0.528, sensitivity: 0.11, and specificity: 0.94. Conclusions: This study identified three ICP trajectories associated with elevated risk, three with reduced risks for mortality during ICU hospitalization. Notably, a fixed ICP threshold should not be applied to all kinds of patients. GBTM, a granular method for describing ICP evolution and their association with clinical outcomes, may add to the current knowledge in intracranial hypertension treatment. Abstract : To summarize, a novel ICP trajectory that could enable us to move the treatment of ABI from a fixed threshold approach to a more individualized treatment was proposed. ICP values and variability differed across these six identified trajectory groups with favorable vs. unfavorable outcomes. The epidemiological shift toward a larger proportion of physiologically fragile elderly patients calls for more attention.