The effects of early pregnancy loss on health outcomes and health care utilization and costs. (9th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Strumpf, Erin C.; Austin, Nichole; Lang, Ariella; Derksen, Shelley; Bolton, James; Brownell, Marni; Gregory, Patricia; Chateau, Dan; Heaman, Maureen
• Is Part Of: Health services research. Volume 57:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 786
• Page End: 795
• Publication Date: 2022-02-09
• Subjects: early pregnancy loss -- ectopic pregnancy -- health care costs -- health services -- miscarriage -- propensity score; Medical care -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Evaluation -- Periodicals; Hospital care -- Periodicals; Health services administration -- Periodicals; 362
• DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.13941
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0017-9124

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate the effects of early pregnancy loss on subsequent health care use and costs. Data Sources: Linked administrative health databases from Manitoba, Canada. Study Design: This was a population‐based cohort study. The exposure of interest was first recorded ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage (EPM). Outcomes included visits to all ambulatory care providers, family physicians (FPs), specialists, and hospitals, as well as the costs associated with these visits. We also assessed the impact of EPM on a global measure of health service utilization and the incidence and costs of psychotropic medications. Data Collection/Extraction Methods: We identified women who experienced their first recorded loss (EPM) from 2003–2012 and created a propensity score model to match these women to women who experienced a live birth, with outcome measures available through 31 December 2014. We used a difference in differences approach with multivariable negative binomial models and generalized estimating equations (GEE) to assess the impact of EPM on the aforementioned health care utilization indicators. Principal Findings: EPM was associated with a short‐term increase in visits to, and costs associated with, certain ambulatory care providers. These findings were driven in large part by increased visits/costs to FPs (rate difference [RD]: $19.92 [95% CI: $16.33, $23.51]) and obstetrician‐gynecologists (OB‐GYNs) (RD $9.41 [95% CI: $8.42, $10.40]) in the year immediately following the loss, excluding care associated with the loss itself. We also detected an increase in hospital stays and costs and a decrease in the use of psychotropic medications relative to matched controls. Conclusion: Pregnancy loss may lead to subsequent increases in certain types of health care utilization. While the absolute costs associated with post‐EPM care are relatively small, the observed patterns of service utilization are informative for providers and policy makers seeking to support women following a loss.