Business as (un)usual: A qualitative study of clerkship experiences during a health crisis. Issue 8 (7th March 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Business as (un)usual: A qualitative study of clerkship experiences during a health crisis. Issue 8 (7th March 2022)
- Main Title:
- Business as (un)usual: A qualitative study of clerkship experiences during a health crisis
- Authors:
- Noerholk, Laerke Marijke
Bader‐Larsen, Karlen S.
Morcke, Anne Mette
Vamadevan, Anishan
Andreasen, Lisbeth Anita
Svendsen, Jesper Hastrup
Jørsboe, Hanne
Tolsgaard, Martin G. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: During a health crisis, hospitals must prioritise activities and resources, which can compromise clerkship‐based learning. We explored how health crises affect clinical clerkships using the COVID‐19 pandemic as an example. Methods: In a constructivist qualitative study, we conducted 22 semi‐structured interviews with key stakeholders (i.e. medical students and doctors) from two teaching hospitals and 10 different departments. We used thematic analysis to investigate our data and used stakeholder theory as a sensitising concept. Results: We identified three themes: (1) emotional triggers and reactions; (2) negotiation of legitimacy; and (3) building resilience. Our results suggest that the health crisis accentuated already existing problems in clerkships, such as students' feelings of low legitimacy, constant negotiation of roles, inconsistencies navigating rules and regulations and low levels of active participation. Medical students and doctors adapted to the new organisational demands by developing increased resilience. Students responded by reaching out for guidance and acceptance to remain relevant in the clinical clerkships. Doctors developed a behaviour of closing in and focused on managing themselves and their patients. This created tension between these two stakeholder groups. Conclusion: A health crisis can critically disrupt the hierarchical structure within the clinical clerkships and exacerbate existing conflicts between stakeholderAbstract: Introduction: During a health crisis, hospitals must prioritise activities and resources, which can compromise clerkship‐based learning. We explored how health crises affect clinical clerkships using the COVID‐19 pandemic as an example. Methods: In a constructivist qualitative study, we conducted 22 semi‐structured interviews with key stakeholders (i.e. medical students and doctors) from two teaching hospitals and 10 different departments. We used thematic analysis to investigate our data and used stakeholder theory as a sensitising concept. Results: We identified three themes: (1) emotional triggers and reactions; (2) negotiation of legitimacy; and (3) building resilience. Our results suggest that the health crisis accentuated already existing problems in clerkships, such as students' feelings of low legitimacy, constant negotiation of roles, inconsistencies navigating rules and regulations and low levels of active participation. Medical students and doctors adapted to the new organisational demands by developing increased resilience. Students responded by reaching out for guidance and acceptance to remain relevant in the clinical clerkships. Doctors developed a behaviour of closing in and focused on managing themselves and their patients. This created tension between these two stakeholder groups. Conclusion: A health crisis can critically disrupt the hierarchical structure within the clinical clerkships and exacerbate existing conflicts between stakeholder groups. When medical students are not perceived as legitimate stakeholders in clinical clerkships during a health crisis, their attendance is perceived as unnecessary or even a nuisance. Despite increased student proactiveness and resilience, their roles inevitably shift from being doctors‐to‐be to students‐to‐be‐managed. Abstract : This study reports that when medical students are not perceived as legitimate stakeholders in clinical clerkships during a health crisis, their roles shift from being doctors‐to‐be to students‐to‐be‐managed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medical education. Volume 56:Issue 8(2022)
- Journal:
- Medical education
- Issue:
- Volume 56:Issue 8(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 56, Issue 8 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 56
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0056-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 805
- Page End:
- 814
- Publication Date:
- 2022-03-07
- Subjects:
- Medical education -- Periodicals
Medical education -- Great Britain -- Periodicals
610.7 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=med ↗
http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0308-0110 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2923 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/medu.14787 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0308-0110
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5527.166000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22407.xml