Dietary and Supplemental Iodine Intake and Urinary Iodine Concentration in a Large Pregnancy Cohort in the United States. (14th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Griebel-Thompson, Adrianne; Sands, Scott; Chollet-Hinton, Lynn; Christifano, Danielle; Sullivan, Debra; Hull, Holly; Carlson, Susan
• Is Part Of: Current developments in nutrition. Volume 6(2022)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 651
• Page End: 651
• Publication Date: 2022-06-14
• Subjects: Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; Nutrition; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; 612.3
• DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzac061.035
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2475-2991

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: The EAR and RDA for iodine (I) intake in pregnancy are 160 and 220 µg/d, respectively; however, dietary I intake by United States (US) pregnant women is unknown. Several professional organizations have recommended a supplement of 150 µg/d during pregnancy, though, the current use of prenatal supplements with I is also unknown. Our objective was to determine I intake from diet and supplements and relate I intake to I status, measured by urinary I concentration (UIC). Methods: Pregnant women (n = 966) were interviewed about their dietary intake by the Diet History Questionnaire 2.0 or multiple 24-hour recalls at baseline and their dietary I intake was estimated using the USDA, FDA and ODS-NIH Database for the Iodine Content of Common Foods (ICCF). Participants were interviewed monthly until delivery to assess I intake from prenatal supplements. Urine samples were collected between 12–20 weeks of gestation, and UIC was measured by the modified Sandell-Kolthoff reaction. A chi-square test compared groups with insufficient and adequate I status to the proportion who met the EAR for I intake. Results: The group median intake of I from diet was below the EAR (108.8 µg/d) however, median intake increased to 188.5 µg/day when supplemental I was included. Seventy-three % of participants (707/966) had a dietary intake below the EAR and 45% (436/966) remained below the EAR after including supplemental I. The group median UIC of 154.2 µg/L indicated a population with marginally adequate I status by WHO standards. Almost half (48%) had a UIC considered to be I insufficient (≤150 µg/L) by WHO. Although slightly more than half (55%, 529/966) were taking a supplement containing I, only 27% (259/966) were taking the recommended 150 µg/d. Iodine status was significantly associated with EAR intake, with 52.1% (227/436) of those with an intake below the EAR being I insufficient (UIC ≤ 150 µg/L) compared to 44.7% (237/530) of those with an I intake above the EAR (p = 0.0229). Conclusions: While consuming a prenatal supplement with I improved the proportion of participants with an intake above the EAR, nearly 45% of the group who consumed more than the EAR had insufficient I status. Funding Sources: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (HD R01083292).