On the growth rate in SL2(Fp)${\rm SL_2}(\mathbb {F}_p)$, the affine group and sum‐product type implications. Issue 3 (9th May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rudnev, Misha; Shkredov, Ilya D.
• Is Part Of: Mathematika. Volume 68:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 738
• Page End: 783
• Publication Date: 2022-05-09
• Subjects: Mathematics -- Periodicals; 510.5
• DOI: 10.1112/mtk.12120
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-5793

Abstract

Abstract: This paper aims to study in more depth the relation between growth in matrix groups SL 2 ( F ) ${\rm SL_2}(\mathbb {F})$ and Aff ( F ) ${\rm Aff}(\mathbb {F})$ over a field F $\mathbb {F}$ by multiplication and geometric incidence estimates, associated with the sum‐product phenomenon over F $\mathbb {F}$ . It presents streamlined proofs of Helfgott's theorems on growth in the F p $\mathbb {F}_p$ ‐case, which avoid sum‐product estimates. For SL 2 ( F p ) ${\rm SL_2}(\mathbb {F}_p)$, for sets exceeding in size some absolute constant, we improve the lower bound 1 1512 $\frac{1}{1512}$ for the growth exponent, due to Kowalski, to 1 20 $\frac{1}{20}$ and establish an upper bound log 3 / 2 8 ∼ 5.13 . $\log _{3/2}8\sim 5.13.$ . for the Cayley graph diameter exponent. For the affine group, we fetch a sharp theorem of Szőnyi on the number of directions, determined by a point set in F p 2 $\mathbb {F}_p^2$ . We then focus on Aff ( F ) ${\rm Aff}(\mathbb {F})$ and present a new incidence bound between a set of points and a set of lines in F 2 $\mathbb {F}^2$, which explicitly depends on the energy of the set of lines as affine transformations under composition. This bound, strong when the number of lines is considerably smaller than the number of points, yields generalisations of structural theorems of Elekes and Murphy on rich lines in grids. In the special case when the set of lines is also a grid — relating back to sum‐products — we use growth in Aff ( R ) ${\rm Aff}(\mathbb {R})$ to obtain a subthreshold estimate on the energy of the set of lines. This yields a unified way to break the ice in various threshold sum‐product type energy inequalities. We show this in applications to energy estimates, corresponding to sets A ( A + A ) $A(A+ A)$, A + A A $A+AA$ (also embracing asymmetric versions) as well as A + B $A+B$ when A has small multiplicative doubling and | A | ⩽ | B | ⩽ | A | 1 + o ( 1 ) $\sqrt {|A|} \leqslant |B|\leqslant |A|^{1+o(1)}$ .