Restricting Sugar or Carbohydrate Intake Does Not Impact Physical Activity Level or Energy Intake Over 24 Hours Despite Changes in Substrate Use: A Randomised Crossover. (14th June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Restricting Sugar or Carbohydrate Intake Does Not Impact Physical Activity Level or Energy Intake Over 24 Hours Despite Changes in Substrate Use: A Randomised Crossover. (14th June 2022)
- Main Title:
- Restricting Sugar or Carbohydrate Intake Does Not Impact Physical Activity Level or Energy Intake Over 24 Hours Despite Changes in Substrate Use: A Randomised Crossover
- Authors:
- Hengist, Aaron
Davies, Russell
Rogers, Peter
Brunstrom, Jeff
Van Loon, Luc
Walhin, Jean-Philippe
Thompson, Dylan
Koumanov, Françoise
Betts, James
Gonzalez, Javier - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: To determine the effects of dietary sugar or carbohydrate restriction on physical activity energy expenditure, energy intake, and physiological outcomes across 24 hours. Methods: In a randomised, open-label crossover design, twenty-five healthy men (n = 10) and women (n = 15) consumed three diets over a 24-hour period: moderate carbohydrate and sugar content (MODSUG = 50% carbohydrate [20% sugars], 15% protein, 35% fat); low sugar content (LOWSUG = 50% carbohydrate [<5% sugars], 15% protein, 35% fat); and low carbohydrate content (LOWCHO = 8% carbohydrate [<5% sugars], 15% protein, 77% fat). Postprandial metabolic responses to a prescribed breakfast (20% EI) were monitored under laboratory conditions before an ad libitum test lunch, with subsequent diet and physical activity monitoring under free-living conditions until blood sample collection the following morning. Results: The MODSUG, LOWSUG and LOWCHO diets resulted in similar mean [95%CI] rates of both physical activity energy expenditure (771 [624, 919] vs 677 [565, 789] vs 802 [614, 991] kcal·d −1 ; p = 0.29] and energy intake (2071 [1794, 2347] vs 2195 [1918, 2473] vs 2194 [1890, 2498] kcal·d −1 ; p = 0.34), respectively. The LOWCHO condition elicited the lowest glycaemic and insulinemic responses to breakfast ( p < 0.01) but the highest 24-h increase in LDL-cholesterol ( p < 0.001), with no differences between the MODSUG and LOWSUG treatments. Leptin concentrations were decreased over 24-hAbstract: Objectives: To determine the effects of dietary sugar or carbohydrate restriction on physical activity energy expenditure, energy intake, and physiological outcomes across 24 hours. Methods: In a randomised, open-label crossover design, twenty-five healthy men (n = 10) and women (n = 15) consumed three diets over a 24-hour period: moderate carbohydrate and sugar content (MODSUG = 50% carbohydrate [20% sugars], 15% protein, 35% fat); low sugar content (LOWSUG = 50% carbohydrate [<5% sugars], 15% protein, 35% fat); and low carbohydrate content (LOWCHO = 8% carbohydrate [<5% sugars], 15% protein, 77% fat). Postprandial metabolic responses to a prescribed breakfast (20% EI) were monitored under laboratory conditions before an ad libitum test lunch, with subsequent diet and physical activity monitoring under free-living conditions until blood sample collection the following morning. Results: The MODSUG, LOWSUG and LOWCHO diets resulted in similar mean [95%CI] rates of both physical activity energy expenditure (771 [624, 919] vs 677 [565, 789] vs 802 [614, 991] kcal·d −1 ; p = 0.29] and energy intake (2071 [1794, 2347] vs 2195 [1918, 2473] vs 2194 [1890, 2498] kcal·d −1 ; p = 0.34), respectively. The LOWCHO condition elicited the lowest glycaemic and insulinemic responses to breakfast ( p < 0.01) but the highest 24-h increase in LDL-cholesterol ( p < 0.001), with no differences between the MODSUG and LOWSUG treatments. Leptin concentrations were decreased over 24-h of consuming LOWCHO relative to LOWSUG ( p < 0.01). Conclusions: When energy density is controlled for, restricting either sugar or total dietary carbohydrate does not modulate physical activity level and energy intake over a 24-hour period despite large changes in metabolism. Funding Sources: This study was supported by The Rank Prize Funds and Kenniscentrum Suiker and Voeding. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Current developments in nutrition. Volume 6(2022)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Current developments in nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 6(2022)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 6, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0006-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 444
- Page End:
- 444
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06-14
- Subjects:
- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Nutrition
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
612.3 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/cdn ↗
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/current-developments-in-nutrition ↗
https://cdn.nutrition.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cdn/nzac057.010 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2475-2991
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22374.xml