Synergistic Effect of a Novel Combination of Pre-, Pro-, and Postbiotics on Microbial Fermentation and Metabolite Production In Vitro. (14th June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Synergistic Effect of a Novel Combination of Pre-, Pro-, and Postbiotics on Microbial Fermentation and Metabolite Production In Vitro. (14th June 2022)
- Main Title:
- Synergistic Effect of a Novel Combination of Pre-, Pro-, and Postbiotics on Microbial Fermentation and Metabolite Production In Vitro
- Authors:
- Vance, Arianne
Raut, Shilpa
Grier-Welch, Adeline
Alamdari, Nima
Sharafi, Mastaneh - Abstract:
- Abstract: Objectives: To test the effect of probiotic strains ( Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 ; PS), a prebiotic (bacteriophage blend; BB), a postbiotic (tributyrin; TB), or a combination of all three (full mix; FM) on microbial fermentation and metabolite production in vitro. Methods: Short term colonic incubation was performed under conditions representative of the proximal large intestine, using the fecal microbiota of a single healthy human donor. At the start of the experiment, treatments and a blank control (BC), were added to the reactors. Each reactor also received a carbohydrate-supplemented nutritional medium and freshly prepared fecal inoculum. Reactors were closed with a rubber septum, made anaerobic through flushing with nitrogen, and incubated for 48 hours. Each condition was run in triplicate. Overall fermentative activity (pH and gas production), changes in microbial metabolite production (short chain fatty acid, lactate, and ammonium analysis) were assessed. Results: In the first 6 hours, microbial fermentation occurred in all treatments, indicated by pH shifts and production of gas and lactate. FM, PS, and BB stimulated production of lactate compared to BC (p < 0.05). After 24 hours, FM, PS and TB stimulated production of butyrate compared to BC (p < 0.05). FM and PS yielded more lactate than either BB or TB (p < 0.05). After 48 hours, FM, PS, BB, and TB each stimulated production of butyrate compared to BC (pAbstract: Objectives: To test the effect of probiotic strains ( Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BB-12 ; PS), a prebiotic (bacteriophage blend; BB), a postbiotic (tributyrin; TB), or a combination of all three (full mix; FM) on microbial fermentation and metabolite production in vitro. Methods: Short term colonic incubation was performed under conditions representative of the proximal large intestine, using the fecal microbiota of a single healthy human donor. At the start of the experiment, treatments and a blank control (BC), were added to the reactors. Each reactor also received a carbohydrate-supplemented nutritional medium and freshly prepared fecal inoculum. Reactors were closed with a rubber septum, made anaerobic through flushing with nitrogen, and incubated for 48 hours. Each condition was run in triplicate. Overall fermentative activity (pH and gas production), changes in microbial metabolite production (short chain fatty acid, lactate, and ammonium analysis) were assessed. Results: In the first 6 hours, microbial fermentation occurred in all treatments, indicated by pH shifts and production of gas and lactate. FM, PS, and BB stimulated production of lactate compared to BC (p < 0.05). After 24 hours, FM, PS and TB stimulated production of butyrate compared to BC (p < 0.05). FM and PS yielded more lactate than either BB or TB (p < 0.05). After 48 hours, FM, PS, BB, and TB each stimulated production of butyrate compared to BC (p < 0.05). Additionally, FM yielded significantly more butyrate than PS, TB, or BB (p < 0.05). Conclusions: All treatments resulted in similar pH profiles and were representative of ideal conditions for bacterial growth and metabolism. The increased production of lactate in FM and PS was attributed to the fermentative activities of probiotics LGG and BB-12. Each treatment stimulated production of butyrate compared to BC but the largest increase in butyrate production was seen in FM, indicating a synergistic relationship between pre-, pro-, and postbiotics. Funding Sources: The study was conducted by an independent lab, ProDigest, and funded and sponsored by Ritual (Natals, Inc.). Compound Solutions, Inc. also financially supported the study. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Current developments in nutrition. Volume 6(2022)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Current developments in nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 6(2022)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 6, Issue 1 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 6
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0006-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- 1034
- Page End:
- 1034
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06-14
- Subjects:
- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Nutrition
Periodicals
Periodicals
Fulltext
Internet Resources
Periodicals
612.3 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/cdn ↗
https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/current-developments-in-nutrition ↗
https://cdn.nutrition.org/ ↗
http://www.oxfordjournals.org/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/cdn/nzac069.039 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2475-2991
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22374.xml