'Street-level' agents operating beyond 'remote control': how overseas liaison officers and foreign state officials shape UK extraterritorial migration management. Issue 1 (2nd January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ostrand, Nicole; Statham, Paul
• Is Part Of: Journal of ethnic and migration studies. Volume 47:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 25
• Page End: 45
• Publication Date: 2021-01-02
• Subjects: Remote control -- extraterritorial migration management -- overseas liaison network -- UK Home Office immigration policy -- immigration control; Ethnic relations -- Periodicals; Race relations -- Periodicals; Emigration and immigration -- Periodicals; Assimilation (Sociology) -- Periodicals; 305.8005
• DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2020.1782729
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1369-183X

Abstract

ABSTRACT : Extraterritorial migration management perspectives on how states try to enforce immigration controls beyond their juridical borders are strongly influenced by 'remote control' metaphors. This is conceptually limited and outdated. Most research fails to sufficiently acknowledge agency by a destination state's officials acting abroad, foreign states and their officials, when evaluating extraterritorial measures and 'outcomes'. We study UK liaison officers abroad, specifically, how they see their efforts to implement extraterritorial immigration control through interactions with foreign state officials. Our approach links inter-state relations to the social world of on-the-ground 'street-level' interactions between officers abroad and their foreign counterparts. The empirical analysis draws from original interviews and official sources. We compare factors accounting for the UK's activities and perceived 'outcomes' across USA, France, Thailand, Egypt and Ghana. Findings show the UK's extraterritorial migration management results from a very long chain of decisions and actions, by foreign and UK state actors, operating at different institutional-levels, with uncontrollable local circumstances abroad. Realising extraterritorial goals depends strongly on liaison officers' agency, 'soft power' over foreign officials and foreign officials' willingness to cooperate. Meanwhile liaison officers' 'feedbacks' importantly influence Home Office decision-making. Against the simplistic one-way causality of 'remote control', this is ' street-level' agency beyond 'remote control' .