Assessing adherence and cost-benefit of colorectal cancer screening for accountable providers. Issue 4 (2nd October 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Heavener, Trace; McStay, Frank W.; Jaeger, Victoria; Stephenson, Kristen; Sager, Lauren; Sing, James
• Is Part Of: Proceedings. Volume 32:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 490
• Page End: 497
• Publication Date: 2019-10-02
• Subjects: Colorectal cancer screening -- cost-benefit model -- preventive care; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine; Medicine -- Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 616.005
• DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1647702
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0899-8280

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this study was to assess adherence and costs-benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings from an accountable care organization/population health perspective. We performed a retrospective review of 94 patients (50–75 years of age) in an integrated safety net system for whom fecal CRC screening was abnormal for the period of June 1, 2014, to June 1, 2016. A cost-benefit model was constructed using Medicare payment rates and a sensitivity analysis. Most patients included in the study (64/94, 68%) received or were offered a colonoscopy. Of those receiving a colonoscopy, 24 of 45 (53%) had an abnormal finding. Total direct medical costs avoided by screening the patient panel was $32, 926 but could have exceeded $63, 237 had more patients received follow-up colonoscopies. A sensitivity analysis with 1000 patients demonstrated total monetary benefits between $2.2 million and $8.16 million when follow-up and colonoscopy rates were allowed to vary. Although the resulting rates of follow-up were within the range reported in the literature, there is room for improvement, especially considering the monetary benefit that could be used on other diseases. Health systems and payers should work cooperatively to structure payment models to better incentivize CRC screenings.