Once an optimist, always an optimist? Studying cognitive judgment bias in mice. (3rd June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bračić, Marko; Bohn, Lena; Siewert, Viktoria; von Kortzfleisch, Vanessa T; Schielzeth, Holger; Kaiser, Sylvia; Sachser, Norbert; Richter, S Helene
• Editors: Pinter-Wollman, Noa
• Is Part Of: Behavioral ecology. Volume 33:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 775
• Page End: 788
• Publication Date: 2022-06-03
• Subjects: animal personality -- anxiety -- behavioral repeatability -- cognitive bias -- decision-making under ambiguity -- genotype-environment interaction -- judgement bias -- spatial learning; Animal behavior -- Periodicals; Behavior evolution -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Psychology, Comparative -- Periodicals; 591.5
• DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arac040
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1045-2249

Abstract

Abstract: Individuals differ in the way they judge ambiguous information: some individuals interpret ambiguous information in a more optimistic, and others in a more pessimistic way. Over the past two decades, such "optimistic" and "pessimistic" cognitive judgment biases (CJBs) have been utilized in animal welfare science as indicators of animals' emotional states. However, empirical studies on their ecological and evolutionary relevance are still lacking. We, therefore, aimed at transferring the concept of "optimism" and "pessimism" to behavioral ecology and investigated the role of genetic and environmental factors in modulating CJB in mice. In addition, we assessed the temporal stability of individual differences in CJB. We show that the chosen genotypes (C57BL/6J and B6D2F1N) and environments ("scarce" and "complex") did not have a statistically significant influence on the responses in the CJB test. By contrast, they influenced anxiety-like behavior with C57BL/6J mice and mice from the "complex" environment displaying less anxiety-like behavior than B6D2F1N mice and mice from the "scarce" environment. As the selected genotypes and environments did not explain the existing differences in CJB, future studies might investigate the impact of other genotypes and environmental conditions on CJB, and additionally, elucidate the role of other potential causes like endocrine profiles and epigenetic modifications. Furthermore, we show that individual differences in CJB were repeatable over a period of seven weeks, suggesting that CJB represents a temporally stable trait in laboratory mice. Therefore, we encourage the further study of CJB within an animal personality framework.