Extrapolation of populations of small earthquakes to predict consequences of low- probability high impact events: The Pohang case study revisited. (May 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Extrapolation of populations of small earthquakes to predict consequences of low- probability high impact events: The Pohang case study revisited. (May 2021)
- Main Title:
- Extrapolation of populations of small earthquakes to predict consequences of low- probability high impact events: The Pohang case study revisited
- Authors:
- Westaway, Rob
- Abstract:
- Highlights: Magnitudes of earthquakes for the Pohang EGS project are underestimated. Reason one is the low Nyquist frequency of digital recording at regional stations Reason two is miscalibration of the local magnitude scale in Korea. Reason three is miscalibration of magnitude estimation by 'template matching'. Accurate magnitudes and b-values are essential for interpretation of EGS seismicity. Abstract: The magnitude (MW ) 5.5 Pohang, Korea, earthquake on 15 November 2017, induced by the Pohang Engineered Geothermal Systems (EGS) project, caused one fatality and ∼US$300 million of economic consequences. The Commission, appointed by the Korean Government to investigate this earthquake, has made public a release of data including magnitudes of the smaller earthquakes associated with the well stimulations. On the basis of this earthquake population, it has been proposed that a significant probability of such losses was predictable beforehand, and that the project should have been suspended, implying that its developer was remiss for not doing so. This argument depends on the low b-value estimated, ∼0.61. However, three factors are shown to contribute, individually or in combination, to inaccuracy of these magnitude determinations: the low recording bandwidth of the permanent seismograph stations in the area; miscalibration of the formula for determining local magnitudes in Korea; and the relation used to estimate magnitudes of smaller events from larger events by templateHighlights: Magnitudes of earthquakes for the Pohang EGS project are underestimated. Reason one is the low Nyquist frequency of digital recording at regional stations Reason two is miscalibration of the local magnitude scale in Korea. Reason three is miscalibration of magnitude estimation by 'template matching'. Accurate magnitudes and b-values are essential for interpretation of EGS seismicity. Abstract: The magnitude (MW ) 5.5 Pohang, Korea, earthquake on 15 November 2017, induced by the Pohang Engineered Geothermal Systems (EGS) project, caused one fatality and ∼US$300 million of economic consequences. The Commission, appointed by the Korean Government to investigate this earthquake, has made public a release of data including magnitudes of the smaller earthquakes associated with the well stimulations. On the basis of this earthquake population, it has been proposed that a significant probability of such losses was predictable beforehand, and that the project should have been suspended, implying that its developer was remiss for not doing so. This argument depends on the low b-value estimated, ∼0.61. However, three factors are shown to contribute, individually or in combination, to inaccuracy of these magnitude determinations: the low recording bandwidth of the permanent seismograph stations in the area; miscalibration of the formula for determining local magnitudes in Korea; and the relation used to estimate magnitudes of smaller events from larger events by template matching. These factors all cause underestimation of magnitudes of the smallest events documented, resulting in underestimation of b-values. The true b-values are higher, being 1.12 for the earthquakes associated with the August 2017 stimulation of well PX-1; similar values are estimated for the other well stimulations. A consequence of this analysis is that the probability of any earthquake as large as MW = 5.5, predicted ahead of its occurrence by extrapolation using b-values, was much lower than has been claimed. This analysis highlights the need for agreed workflow specifications for reporting datasets like this, where the data might influence prosecution of EGS developers, as well as agreed specifications for acceptable economic risk arising from EGS projects. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Geothermics. Volume 92(2021)
- Journal:
- Geothermics
- Issue:
- Volume 92(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 92, Issue 2021 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 92
- Issue:
- 2021
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0092-2021-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-05
- Subjects:
- Pohang -- Korea -- EGS -- Earthquake -- Seismicity -- Risk
Hydrogeology -- Periodicals
Geothermal resources -- Periodicals
Énergie géothermique -- Périodiques
GEOTHERMAL ENGINEERING
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY
GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION
Geothermal resources
Hydrogeology
Periodicals
Electronic journals
621.44 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.journals.elsevier.com/geothermics/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03756505 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.102035 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0375-6505
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4161.040000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22329.xml