A scoping review of active, participant-centred, digital adverse events following immunization (AEFI) surveillance: A Canadian immunization research network study. Issue 31 (29th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Psihogios, Athanasios; Brianne Bota, A.; Mithani, Salima S.; Greyson, Devon; Zhu, David T.; Fung, Stephen G.; Wilson, Sarah E.; Fell, Deshayne B.; Top, Karina A.; Bettinger, Julie A.; Wilson, Kumanan
• Is Part Of: Vaccine. Volume 40:Issue 31(2022)
• Page Start: 4065
• Page End: 4080
• Publication Date: 2022-07-29
• Subjects: Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) -- Vaccine safety surveillance -- Active surveillance -- Post-marketing surveillance -- Participant reporting -- Pharmacovigilance; Vaccines -- Periodicals; 615.372
• DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.103
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0264-410X

Abstract

Highlights: Australia produces the most research on this topic. Smartvax is the most studied digital system. Email, SMS, and e-questionnaires are the most commonly used digital solutions. Abstract: Background: Post-licensure adverse events following immunization (AEFI) surveillance is conducted to monitor vaccine safety, such as identifying batch/brand issues and rare reactions, which consequently improves community confidence. The integration of technology has been proposed to improve AEFI surveillance, however, there is an absence of description regarding which digital solutions are successfully being used and their unique characteristics. Objectives: The objectives of this scoping review were to 1) map the research landscape on digital systems used for active, participant-centred, AEFI surveillance and 2) describe their core components. Methods: We conducted a scoping review informed by the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRSIMA-ScR) guideline. OVID-Medline, Embase Classic + Embase, and Medrxiv were searched by a medical librarian from January 1, 2000 to January 28th, 2021. Two independent reviewers determined which studies met inclusion based on pre-specified eligibility criteria. Data extraction was conducted using pre-made tables with specific variables by one investigator and verified by a second. Results: Twenty-seven publications met inclusion, the majority of which came from Australia (n = 15) and Canada (n = 6). The most studied active, participant-centred, digital AEFI surveillance systems were SmartVax (n = 8) (Australia), Vaxtracker (n = 7) (Australia), and Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) Network (Canada) (n = 6). The two most common methods of communicating with vaccinees reported were short-message-service (SMS) (n = 15) and e-mail (n = 14), with online questionnaires being the primary method of data collection (n = 20). Conclusion: Active, participant-centred, digital AEFI surveillance is an area actively being researched as depicted by the literature landscape mapped by this scoping reviewWe hypothesize that the AEFI surveillance approach herein described could become a primary method of collecting self-reported subjective symptoms and reactogenicity from vaccinees, complementing existing systems. Future evaluation of identified digital solutions is necessary to bring about improvements to current vaccine surveillance systems to meet contemporary and future public health needs.