A Physically Based Method for Soil Evaporation Estimation by Revisiting the Soil Drying Process. Issue 11 (14th November 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Yunquan; Merlin, Olivier; Zhu, Gaofeng; Zhang, Kun
• Is Part Of: Water resources research. Volume 55:Issue 11(2019)
• Page Start: 9092
• Page End: 9110
• Publication Date: 2019-11-14
• Subjects: Hydrology -- Periodicals; 333.91
• DOI: 10.1029/2019WR025003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0043-1397

Abstract

Abstract: While numerous models exist for soil evaporation estimation, they are more or less empirically based either in the model structure or in the determination of introduced parameters. The main difficulty lies in representing the water stress factor, which is usually thought to be limited by capillarity‐supported water supply or by vapor diffusion flux. Recent progress in understanding soil hydraulic properties, however, have found that the film flow, which is often neglected, is the dominant process under low moisture conditions. By including the impact of film flow, a reexamination on the typical evaporation process found that this usually neglected film flow might be the dominant process for supporting the Stage II evaporation (i.e., the fast falling rate stage), besides the generally accepted capillary flow‐supported Stage I evaporation and the vapor diffusion‐controlled Stage III evaporation. A physically based model for estimating the evaporation rate was then developed by parameterizing the Buckingham‐Darcy's law. Interestingly, the empirical Bucket model was found to be a specific form of the proposed model. The proposed model requires the in‐equilibrium relative humidity as the sole input for representing water stress and introduces no adjustable parameter in relation to soil texture. The impact of vapor diffusion was also discussed. Model testing with laboratory data yielded an excellent agreement with observations for both thin soil and thick soil column evaporation experiments. Model evaluation at 15 field sites generally showed a close agreement with observations, with a great improvement in the lower range of evaporation rates in comparison with the widely applied Priestley and Taylor Jet Propulsion Laboratory model. Key Points: Film flow held by adsorption forces is thought to be the dominant process for supporting the fast falling evaporation rate stage A theoretical model that accounts for film flow was developed for evaporation rate estimation The proposed model, requiring no adjustable parameters, yields close agreement with both laboratory and field observations