Antecedents of students' identification with university brands: A study on public universities in Iran. Issue 4 (13th March 2019)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fazli-Salehi, Reza; Esfidani, Mohammad Rahim; Torres, Ivonne M.; Zúñiga, Miguel Angel
• Is Part Of: Asia Pacific journal of marketing and logistics. Volume 31:Issue 4(2019)
• Page Start: 830
• Page End: 854
• Publication Date: 2019-03-13
• Subjects: Brand identification -- Value congruence -- Brand personality congruence -- University brand; Marketing -- Asia -- Periodicals; Marketing -- Pacific Area -- Periodicals; Business logistics -- Asia -- Periodicals; Business logistics -- Pacific Area -- Periodicals; Consumer behavior -- Asia -- Periodicals; Consumer behavior -- Pacific Area -- Periodicals; 381.095
• DOI: 10.1108/APJML-07-2018-0242
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1355-5855

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: Universities are increasingly encountering high levels of national and international competition. In order for universities to continue with their business success and expansion, they have relied on developing and maintaining a differentiated brand identity by improving their branding strategy. The purpose of this paper is to examine the antecedents of students' identification with the brand of public universities in Iran. Design/methodology/approach: Sampling was done in multiple stages. In the first stage – using stratified sampling – students were recruited from distinct degree programs and universities based on the Iranian national demographic proportions. In the second stage, convenient sampling was used within each degree program category. For data collection, the interviewer distributed questionnaires among students regardless of age and gender. The number of questionnaires distributed in each university (i.e. the sample size in each university) was determined using the number of students in the country and percentage of students at each university. Findings: The results showed support for the hypothesized positive relationship between brand identification and the antecedent factors including prestige, interorganizational and intraorganizational competition. On the other hand, the results showed no significant relationship between brand identification and the antecedent factors including distinctiveness and memorable experience. Outcomes (i.e. word-of-mouth, active engagement and loyalty) of brand identification were also tested and their relationships with brand identification are supported. Research limitations/implications: This study was conducted in the higher education sector in one cosmopolitan Iranian city (i.e. Tehran) to which Iranians from other cities travel to for studying. Thus, the results of this survey include a variety of sub-cultures. In the future, a study that incorporates all major metropolitan cities of Iran may increase the generalizability of the findings. Unrelated to the purpose of this study, a future research study may extend the currently studied geographical dimensions and examine the antecedents of students' identification with the brand of public universities across different nations using a cross-cultural approach. Practical implications: A study of the antecedents of students' identification with the university brand can provide a guide for universities to manage their brand and marketing strategies. Managers of higher education institutions can take important steps in establishing a link between students and university brands. Managers can highlight interorganizational competitions. The authors recommended universities publicize and honor students' success in academic competitions on the university website, via ceremonies dedicated to the student winners, and using print banners that identifies their name and achievement, among other mediums. Additionally, competitions can be promoted among students through professors and motivational speeches from recognized leaders. Originality/value: Results revealed that brand prestige of public universities positively affects students' identification. This study highlights the importance of national and international rankings of universities and the sensitivity of students to such rankings. Undoubtedly, this is evident in Iranian students' behavior in selecting their university. Additionally, this study showed that brand distinctiveness of public universities does not significantly affect students' identification with the university brand. Further examination is recommended to help explain this finding and a cross-cultural comparison will assist in this endeavor.