Efficacy of convalescent plasma for treatment of COVID-19 in Uganda. Issue 1 (9th August 2021)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Efficacy of convalescent plasma for treatment of COVID-19 in Uganda. Issue 1 (9th August 2021)
- Main Title:
- Efficacy of convalescent plasma for treatment of COVID-19 in Uganda
- Authors:
- Kirenga, Bruce
Byakika-Kibwika, Pauline
Muttamba, Winters
Kayongo, Alex
Loryndah, Namakula Olive
Mugenyi, Levicatus
Kiwanuka, Noah
Lusiba, John
Atukunda, Angella
Mugume, Raymond
Ssali, Francis
Ddungu, Henry
Katagira, Winceslaus
Sekibira, Rogers
Kityo, Cissy
Kyeyune, Dorothy
Acana, Susan
Aanyu-Tukamuhebwa, Hellen
Kabweru, Wilberforce
Nakwagala, Fred
Bagaya, Bernard Sentalo
Kimuli, Ivan
Nantanda, Rebecca
Buregyeya, Esther
Byarugaba, Baterana
Olaro, Charles
Mwebesa, Henry
Joloba, Moses Lutaakome
Siddharthan, Trishul
Bazeyo, William - Abstract:
- Abstract : Rationale: Convalescent plasma (CCP) has been studied as a potential therapy for COVID-19, but data on its efficacy in Africa are limited. Objective: In this trial we set out to determine the efficacy of CCP for treatment of COVID-19 in Uganda. Measurements: Patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR test irrespective of disease severity were hospitalised and randomised to receive either COVID-19 CCP plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. The primary outcome was time to viral clearance, defined as having two consecutive RT-PCR-negative tests by day 28. Secondary outcomes included time to symptom resolution, clinical status on the modified WHO Ordinal Clinical Scale (≥1-point increase), progression to severe/critical condition (defined as oxygen saturation <93% or needing oxygen), mortality and safety. Main results: A total of 136 patients were randomised, 69 to CCP+SOC and 67 to SOC only. The median age was 50 years (IQR: 38.5–62.0), 71.3% were male and the median duration of symptom was 7 days (IQR=4–8). Time to viral clearance was not different between the CCP+SOC and SOC arms (median of 6 days (IQR=4–11) vs 4 (IQR=4–6), p=0.196). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes in CCP+SOC versus SOC: time to symptom resolution (median=7 (IQR=5–7) vs 7 (IQR=5–10) days, p=0.450), disease progression (9 (22.0%) vs 7 (24.0%) patients, p=0.830) and mortality (10 (14.5%) vs 8 (11.9%) deaths, p=0.476). Conclusion: InAbstract : Rationale: Convalescent plasma (CCP) has been studied as a potential therapy for COVID-19, but data on its efficacy in Africa are limited. Objective: In this trial we set out to determine the efficacy of CCP for treatment of COVID-19 in Uganda. Measurements: Patients with a positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR test irrespective of disease severity were hospitalised and randomised to receive either COVID-19 CCP plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. The primary outcome was time to viral clearance, defined as having two consecutive RT-PCR-negative tests by day 28. Secondary outcomes included time to symptom resolution, clinical status on the modified WHO Ordinal Clinical Scale (≥1-point increase), progression to severe/critical condition (defined as oxygen saturation <93% or needing oxygen), mortality and safety. Main results: A total of 136 patients were randomised, 69 to CCP+SOC and 67 to SOC only. The median age was 50 years (IQR: 38.5–62.0), 71.3% were male and the median duration of symptom was 7 days (IQR=4–8). Time to viral clearance was not different between the CCP+SOC and SOC arms (median of 6 days (IQR=4–11) vs 4 (IQR=4–6), p=0.196). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes in CCP+SOC versus SOC: time to symptom resolution (median=7 (IQR=5–7) vs 7 (IQR=5–10) days, p=0.450), disease progression (9 (22.0%) vs 7 (24.0%) patients, p=0.830) and mortality (10 (14.5%) vs 8 (11.9%) deaths, p=0.476). Conclusion: In this African trial, CCP therapy did not result in beneficial virological or clinical improvements. Further trials are needed to determine subgroups of patients who may benefit from CCP in Africa. Trial registration number NCT04542941 . … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- BMJ open respiratory research. Volume 8:Issue 1(2021)
- Journal:
- BMJ open respiratory research
- Issue:
- Volume 8:Issue 1(2021)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 8, Issue 1 (2021)
- Year:
- 2021
- Volume:
- 8
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2021-0008-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2021-08-09
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- respiratory infection -- viral infection
Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Respiratory therapy -- Periodicals
616.2005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.bmj.com/archive ↗
http://bmjopenrespres.bmj.com/content/by/year ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001017 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2052-4439
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22295.xml