Moving from consultation to co-creation with knowledge users in scoping reviews: guidance from the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group. Issue 4 (April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pollock, Danielle; Alexander, Lyndsay; Munn, Zachary; Peters, Micah D.J.; Khalil, Hanan; Godfrey, Christina M.; McInerney, Patricia; Synnot, Anneliese; Tricco, Andrea C.
• Is Part Of: JBI evidence synthesis. Volume 20:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: 969
• Page End: 979
• Publication Date: 2022-04
• Subjects: engagement -- evidence synthesis -- knowledge user -- methodology -- scoping reviews; Evidence-Based Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodical; Evidence-based medicine; Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00416
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2689-8381

Abstract

Abstract : ABSTRACT: Knowledge user consultation is often limited or omitted in the conduct of scoping reviews. Not including knowledge users within the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews could be due to a lack of guidance or understanding about what consultation requires and the subsequent benefits. Knowledge user engagement in evidence synthesis, including consultation approaches, has many associated benefits, including improved relevance of the research and better dissemination and implementation of research findings. Scoping reviews, however, have not been specifically focused on in terms of research into knowledge user consultation and evidence syntheses. In this paper, we will present JBI's guidance for knowledge user engagement in scoping reviews based on the expert opinion of the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group. We offer specific guidance on how this can occur and provide information regarding how to report and evaluate knowledge user engagement within scoping reviews. We believe that scoping review authors should embed knowledge user engagement into all scoping reviews and strive towards a co-creation model.