Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting. (June 2022)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting. (June 2022)
- Main Title:
- Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen testing in a real-life clinical setting
- Authors:
- Jegerlehner, Sabrina
Suter-Riniker, Franziska
Jent, Philipp
Bittel, Pascal
Nagler, Michael - Abstract:
- Highlights: SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen tests facilitate testing with poorly trained personnel Their diagnostic accuracy in clinical settings is essentially unclear We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study in a real-life clinical setting The diagnostic accuracy of the PCL saliva antigen test was 30.2% Application of the test might lead to a large number of false-negative test results Abstract: Background: SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests with saliva facilitate examination in settings that lack trained personnel. However, little is known about the diagnostic accuracy in real-life clinical settings. Therefore, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of a saliva antigen test in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection in a primary/secondary care testing facility. Methods: Individuals who presented at a COVID-19 testing facility affiliated with a Swiss university hospital were prospectively recruited (n=377). Saliva specimen was obtained, and the PCL Inc. COVID19 Gold antigen test was conducted in parallel with 2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays from a nasopharyngeal swab. Results: RT-PCR results were positive in 53 individuals, corresponding to a prevalence of 14.1% (missing material in 1 individual). The PCL saliva antigen test was positive in 22 individuals (5.8%) and negative in 354 (93.9%). The sensitivity of the saliva antigen test was 30.2% (95% confidence interval 18.3, 44.3), both overall and in symptomatic individuals. The specificity was 98.1% (96.0, 99.3). Conclusions:Highlights: SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen tests facilitate testing with poorly trained personnel Their diagnostic accuracy in clinical settings is essentially unclear We conducted a diagnostic accuracy study in a real-life clinical setting The diagnostic accuracy of the PCL saliva antigen test was 30.2% Application of the test might lead to a large number of false-negative test results Abstract: Background: SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests with saliva facilitate examination in settings that lack trained personnel. However, little is known about the diagnostic accuracy in real-life clinical settings. Therefore, we studied the diagnostic accuracy of a saliva antigen test in diagnosing SARS-CoV-2 infection in a primary/secondary care testing facility. Methods: Individuals who presented at a COVID-19 testing facility affiliated with a Swiss university hospital were prospectively recruited (n=377). Saliva specimen was obtained, and the PCL Inc. COVID19 Gold antigen test was conducted in parallel with 2 real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays from a nasopharyngeal swab. Results: RT-PCR results were positive in 53 individuals, corresponding to a prevalence of 14.1% (missing material in 1 individual). The PCL saliva antigen test was positive in 22 individuals (5.8%) and negative in 354 (93.9%). The sensitivity of the saliva antigen test was 30.2% (95% confidence interval 18.3, 44.3), both overall and in symptomatic individuals. The specificity was 98.1% (96.0, 99.3). Conclusions: The diagnostic accuracy of a SARS-CoV-2 saliva antigen test in a primary/secondary care testing facility was remarkably lower than that reported in the manufacturer's specifications. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- International journal of infectious diseases. Volume 119(2022)
- Journal:
- International journal of infectious diseases
- Issue:
- Volume 119(2022)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 119, Issue 2022 (2022)
- Year:
- 2022
- Volume:
- 119
- Issue:
- 2022
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2022-0119-2022-0000
- Page Start:
- 38
- Page End:
- 40
- Publication Date:
- 2022-06
- Subjects:
- Infections/*epidemiology/transmission -- severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 [Supplementary Concept] -- COVID-19 diagnostic testing [Supplementary Concept]
Communicable diseases -- Periodicals
Communicable Diseases -- Periodicals
Communicable diseases
Periodicals
Electronic journals
616.9 - Journal URLs:
- http://bibpurl.oclc.org/web/73769 ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-infectious-diseases/ ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/12019712 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com/dura/browse/journalIssue/12019712 ↗
http://www.clinicalkey.com.au/dura/browse/journalIssue/12019712 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.037 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1201-9712
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4542.304750
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 22273.xml