Assessing the quality and reliability of patient information regarding aesthetic fat grafting on YouTube. Issue 7 (July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dembinski, Doug; Moore, Meredith G.; Effendi, Maleeh; Ovalle, Fernando; Gobble, Ryan
• Is Part Of: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery. Volume 75:Issue 7(2022)
• Page Start: 2343
• Page End: 2345
• Publication Date: 2022-07
• Subjects: YouTube -- Internet -- Digital media -- Fat grafting -- Fat transfer -- Video quality -- Plastic surgery -- Aesthetic surgery -- Body contouring; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures -- Periodicals; Surgery, Plastic -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 617.9505
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.01.053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1748-6815

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Patients increasingly consult social media regarding aesthetic surgery. Given the popularity of fat transfer operations, this study assesses the quality and reliability of patient information available on YouTube regarding aesthetic fat grafting. Methods: The terms "fat grafting" and "fat transfer" were searched on YouTube with respect to the terms "face", "breast", "buttock", and "Brazilian butt lift". Filtered by view count, the top 20 unique, English language, aesthetic surgery-related videos for each search combination were reviewed by three independent reviewers for demographic and descriptive characteristics. Videos were rated for information reliability and quality using the modified DISCERN (MD) tool (1 = low, 5 = high) and global quality scale (GQS) (1 = poor, 5 = excellent). Results: Out of 80 total videos, 76% were authored by physicians and 24% by laypersons. The overall mean MD score was 1.5 and the mean GQS was 2.6. Videos authored by physicians outscored those by non-medical authors (MD: 1.6 vs. 1.3; GQS 2.7 vs. 2.2). Board-certified plastic surgeon videos ( N = 30) scored higher on both the MD (1.7 vs 1.3) and GQS (3.1 vs 2.2) than those of non-medical authors. On the contrary, videos by laypersons and non-plastic surgeons had 40% more views, twice as many "likes" and nearly double as many subscribers. Conclusion: The overall quality of information presented in aesthetic fat grafting procedures videos on YouTube is low and from unreliable sources. Surgeons should educate patients regarding potentially inaccurate information, and professional societies should disseminate high-quality media.