The effects of target density, porosity, and friction on impact crater morphometry: Exploratory experimentation using various granular materials. (10th June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cline, Christopher J.; Cintala, Mark J.
• Is Part Of: Meteoritics & planetary science. Volume 57:Number 7(2022)
• Page Start: 1441
• Page End: 1459
• Publication Date: 2022-06-10
• Subjects: Meteorites -- Periodicals; Planetology -- Periodicals; 523.4
• DOI: 10.1111/maps.13886
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1086-9379

Abstract

Abstract: The dimensions of relatively small‐scale impact craters are undoubtedly sensitive to the physical properties of the target. Studying gravity‐controlled crater formation at the laboratory scale often relies on cohesionless, granular materials, which, by their nature, make it difficult to separate the individual contributions to this process from all of the relevant target properties. Here, we conduct a suite of impact experiments to isolate and evaluate the effects of density, porosity, and internal friction on impact crater morphometry. Each made from one of four different granular materials, targets were impacted vertically with 4.76 mm aluminum projectiles at an average speed of ~1.55 km s −1 . Two different methods were used to load these materials into the target bucket (pouring and sieving), resulting in targets that varied in bulk density and internal friction. The experimental results indicate that depth–diameter ratios of the craters are largely influenced by the loading method of the target material and are sensitive to the friction and porosity of the targets. Sieved targets (relatively higher density, lower porosity, and higher friction angle) produce craters that are markedly shallower, have notably smaller volumes, and exhibit a flat‐floored morphology, with some possessing small central mounds. Flat‐floored craters are typically attributed to a strength‐layered target; in these experiments, however, they were produced in cohesionless targets. This study demonstrates that a flat floor is not necessarily diagnostic of strength layering in a target and, in some instances, might be the consequence of greater shear strengths in granular materials with high coefficients of static friction.