The cost of caring: How advanced cancer patients affect Caregiver's employment in Singapore. Issue 7 (21st February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Su, Jasmine; Malhotra, Chetna
• Is Part Of: Psycho-oncology. Volume 31:Issue 7(2022)
• Page Start: 1152
• Page End: 1160
• Publication Date: 2022-02-21
• Subjects: advanced cancer -- ageing -- burden of cancer -- employment -- health shock -- informal caregiving -- oncology -- Psycho‐oncology; Cancer -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Social aspects -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- psychology -- Periodicals; 616.9940019
• DOI: 10.1002/pon.5903
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1057-9249

Abstract

Abstract: Background: With ageing populations and rising cancer incidence, more people are becoming informal caregivers. Informal caregivers are less likely to work than non‐caregivers, yet little is known about how their employment changes over time. This study aimed to examine the association between decline in cancer patient's health (termed health shock) and caregiver's employment. A secondary aim was to assess characteristics of caregivers who stayed employed despite the health shock and the burden of caring for advanced stage cancer patients. Method: This study used data from 270 dyads of advanced cancer patients and their caregivers who participated in the Cost of Medical Care of Patients with Advanced Serious Illness in Singapore study. The dyads were interviewed every 3 months for 2 years. Fixed‐effects regression was used to analyse the association between patient health shock and two caregiver employment outcomes (i.e., employment status and work disruptions). Results: Ninety‐seven% of caregivers whose patient experienced a health shock reported work disruptions. About 13% of caregivers whose patient experienced at least one health shock left employment, compared to 5% of those whose patient did not experience any health shock. Following a patient health shock, caregivers were significantly less likely to be employed (β: −0.03; 95% CI, −0.05 to −0.001) and more likely to experience work disruptions (β: 0.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.01 to 0.12). Caregivers who were young, educated, unmarried, not spousal caregivers, and not living with their patients were more likely to stay employed despite patient health shock ( p < 0.01 for all). Conclusion: Findings show that caregivers' employment is affected by their patients' health through the caregiving trajectory. Continuous support for caregivers catered to specific vulnerable subgroups may be important to keeping caregivers in the workforce.