The Concrete Conditions of Human Rights: Western and Chinese Approaches. Issue 2 (3rd April 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boer, Roland
• Is Part Of: International critical thought. Volume 12:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: 237
• Page End: 252
• Publication Date: 2022-04-03
• Subjects: Concrete universals -- Western liberalism -- Chinese Marxism -- anti-hegemonic sovereignty -- socioeconomic well-being; Critical thinking -- Periodicals; Current events -- Periodicals; 153.4205
• DOI: 10.1080/21598282.2022.2074512
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2159-8282

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Based on the principle that universals are valid if they are concrete universals, this article provides a comparison between Western liberal and Chinese Marxist approaches to human rights. It does so in three steps. First is the analysis of the foundations, or roots, of the Western liberal emphasis on an individual's mastery over a "right" understood in terms of private property, and the Marxist tradition's emphasis on anti-hegemonic sovereignty in light of anti-colonial struggles for national liberation. Second is the contrast between the development of the Western approach to the core human rights in terms of freedom of expression, movement, and assembly, and the Marxist emphasis on the right to socioeconomic well-being, or common prosperity. Third is the comparison between the fruits of either tradition, one in terms of identity politics, and the other in the emphasis on civil, political, cultural, and environmental rights. The article concludes by asking whether the two approaches are able to come to an understanding of each other, and proposes that such an understanding may need to take place in light of the concept and reality of concrete universals.