Comparison of scattered entrance skin dose burden in MSCT, CBCT, and X-ray for suspected scaphoid injury: Regional dose measurements in a phantom model. Issue 3 (August 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hughes, J.; Harris, M.; Snaith, B.; Benn, H.
• Is Part Of: Radiography. Volume 28:Issue 3(2022)
• Page Start: 811
• Page End: 816
• Publication Date: 2022-08
• Subjects: CBCT -- MSCT -- Scaphoid -- Scatter -- Phantom; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Cancer -- Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Diagnostic Imaging -- Periodicals; Neoplasms -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques; Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Cancer -- Radiothérapie -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.01.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-8174

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Scaphoid radiography has poor sensitivity for acute fracture detection and often requires repeat delayed imaging. Although magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is considered the gold standard, computed tomography (CT) is often used as an alternative due to ease of access. Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) offers equivalent diagnostic efficacy to Multi Slice CT (MSCT) at reduced dose. We aimed to establish the difference in scattered dose between modalities for scaphoid imaging. Methods: Anatomical regional entrance surface dose measurements were taken at 3 regions on an anthropomorphic torso phantom positioned as a patient to a wrist phantom undergoing scaphoid imaging for three modalities (CBCT, MSCT, four-view projection radiography). Exposure factors were based on audit of clinical exposures. Each dose measurement was repeated three times per anatomical region, modality, exposure setting and projection. Results: Under unpaired T-test CBCT gave significantly lower mean dose at the neck (1.64 vs 18 mGy), chest (2.78 vs 8.01) and abdomen (1.288 vs 2.93) than MSCT (p < .0001). However CBCT had significantly higher mean dose than four-view radiography at the neck, chest and abdomen (0.031, 0.035, and 0.021 mGy) (p < .0001). Conclusion: CBCT of the wrist carries a significantly higher scattered radiation dose to the neck, chest and abdomen than four view scaphoid radiography, but significantly lower scattered dose than MSCT of the wrist of equivalent diagnostic value. Implications for practice: The use of CBCT for scaphoid injury carries significantly lower scattered dose to radio-sensitive structures investigated here than equivalent MSCT, and may be of greater use as an early cross-sectional investigation for suspected scaphoid fracture.